TY - JOUR
T1 - Interview expectancies
T2 - awareness of potential biases influences behaviour in interviewees
AU - Adams-Quackenbush, Nicole M.
AU - Horselenberg, Robert
AU - Hubert, Josephine
AU - Vrij, Aldert
AU - van Koppen, Peter
PY - 2019/1/2
Y1 - 2019/1/2
N2 - Expectancy effects are known to influence behaviour so that what is expected appears to be true. In this study, expectancy was induced using (fabricated) information about honesty and specific group membership. Targets were tested in a non-accusatory interview environment using neutral and information-gathering questions. It was hypothesized that those exposed to the negative information (the expectancy) would demonstrate behaviour consistent with an increased cognitive load, and evidence was found to support this prediction. Due to the investigative nature of the information-gathering questions, it was also expected that the targets exposed to the expectancy would exhibit more of these behaviours in the investigative portion of the interview. Some behaviour was found to support this prediction (i.e. shorter responses and increased speech disturbances); however, indicators of performance altering load were not observed during this phase of the interview. These findings support the hypothesis that expectancy effects can noticeably alter interviewee behaviour.
AB - Expectancy effects are known to influence behaviour so that what is expected appears to be true. In this study, expectancy was induced using (fabricated) information about honesty and specific group membership. Targets were tested in a non-accusatory interview environment using neutral and information-gathering questions. It was hypothesized that those exposed to the negative information (the expectancy) would demonstrate behaviour consistent with an increased cognitive load, and evidence was found to support this prediction. Due to the investigative nature of the information-gathering questions, it was also expected that the targets exposed to the expectancy would exhibit more of these behaviours in the investigative portion of the interview. Some behaviour was found to support this prediction (i.e. shorter responses and increased speech disturbances); however, indicators of performance altering load were not observed during this phase of the interview. These findings support the hypothesis that expectancy effects can noticeably alter interviewee behaviour.
KW - cognitive load
KW - expectancy effects
KW - information-gathering
KW - interviewee behaviour
KW - investigative interviews
KW - stereotype activation
KW - truth-tellers
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85060550860&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85060550860&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/13218719.2018.1485522
DO - 10.1080/13218719.2018.1485522
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85060550860
VL - 26
SP - 150
EP - 166
JO - Psychiatry, Psychology and Law
JF - Psychiatry, Psychology and Law
SN - 1321-8719
IS - 1
ER -