Intra- and extra-union flexibility in meeting the European union's emission reduction targets

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

The EU has proposed four flexibility mechanisms for the regulation of greenhouse gas emissions in the period 2013-2020: (1) the Emissions Trade Scheme (ETS), a permit market between selected companies; (2) trade in non-ETS allotments between Member States; (3) the Clean Development Mechanism (CDM) to purchase offsets in developing countries; and (4) trade in CDM warrants between Member States. This paper shows that aggregate abatement costs fall as flexibility increases. However, limited flexibility creates rents so that increasing flexibility raises costs in some Member States. Costs are reduced more by the CDM than by non-ETS trade. The CDM warrants market reduces costs by a small amount only; market power is a real issue. However, the warrants market is obsolete in case there is non-ETS trade. The CDM leads to price convergence between the ETS and non-ETS market. There would be one price for carbon in the European Union if the proposed limits on CDM access are relaxed slightly. © 2009 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)4329-4336
JournalEnergy Policy
Volume37
Issue number11
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2009

Fingerprint

European Union
clean development mechanism
market
Costs
emission reduction
cost
abatement cost
Gas emissions
Developing countries
Greenhouse gases
greenhouse gas
developing world
Carbon
carbon
Industry

Cite this

@article{43b1d5bd629b4a539694fae3b6ff900f,
title = "Intra- and extra-union flexibility in meeting the European union's emission reduction targets",
abstract = "The EU has proposed four flexibility mechanisms for the regulation of greenhouse gas emissions in the period 2013-2020: (1) the Emissions Trade Scheme (ETS), a permit market between selected companies; (2) trade in non-ETS allotments between Member States; (3) the Clean Development Mechanism (CDM) to purchase offsets in developing countries; and (4) trade in CDM warrants between Member States. This paper shows that aggregate abatement costs fall as flexibility increases. However, limited flexibility creates rents so that increasing flexibility raises costs in some Member States. Costs are reduced more by the CDM than by non-ETS trade. The CDM warrants market reduces costs by a small amount only; market power is a real issue. However, the warrants market is obsolete in case there is non-ETS trade. The CDM leads to price convergence between the ETS and non-ETS market. There would be one price for carbon in the European Union if the proposed limits on CDM access are relaxed slightly. {\circledC} 2009 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.",
author = "R.S.J. Tol",
year = "2009",
doi = "10.1016/j.enpol.2009.05.048",
language = "English",
volume = "37",
pages = "4329--4336",
journal = "Energy Policy",
issn = "0301-4215",
publisher = "Elsevier BV",
number = "11",

}

Intra- and extra-union flexibility in meeting the European union's emission reduction targets. / Tol, R.S.J.

In: Energy Policy, Vol. 37, No. 11, 2009, p. 4329-4336.

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Intra- and extra-union flexibility in meeting the European union's emission reduction targets

AU - Tol, R.S.J.

PY - 2009

Y1 - 2009

N2 - The EU has proposed four flexibility mechanisms for the regulation of greenhouse gas emissions in the period 2013-2020: (1) the Emissions Trade Scheme (ETS), a permit market between selected companies; (2) trade in non-ETS allotments between Member States; (3) the Clean Development Mechanism (CDM) to purchase offsets in developing countries; and (4) trade in CDM warrants between Member States. This paper shows that aggregate abatement costs fall as flexibility increases. However, limited flexibility creates rents so that increasing flexibility raises costs in some Member States. Costs are reduced more by the CDM than by non-ETS trade. The CDM warrants market reduces costs by a small amount only; market power is a real issue. However, the warrants market is obsolete in case there is non-ETS trade. The CDM leads to price convergence between the ETS and non-ETS market. There would be one price for carbon in the European Union if the proposed limits on CDM access are relaxed slightly. © 2009 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

AB - The EU has proposed four flexibility mechanisms for the regulation of greenhouse gas emissions in the period 2013-2020: (1) the Emissions Trade Scheme (ETS), a permit market between selected companies; (2) trade in non-ETS allotments between Member States; (3) the Clean Development Mechanism (CDM) to purchase offsets in developing countries; and (4) trade in CDM warrants between Member States. This paper shows that aggregate abatement costs fall as flexibility increases. However, limited flexibility creates rents so that increasing flexibility raises costs in some Member States. Costs are reduced more by the CDM than by non-ETS trade. The CDM warrants market reduces costs by a small amount only; market power is a real issue. However, the warrants market is obsolete in case there is non-ETS trade. The CDM leads to price convergence between the ETS and non-ETS market. There would be one price for carbon in the European Union if the proposed limits on CDM access are relaxed slightly. © 2009 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

U2 - 10.1016/j.enpol.2009.05.048

DO - 10.1016/j.enpol.2009.05.048

M3 - Article

VL - 37

SP - 4329

EP - 4336

JO - Energy Policy

JF - Energy Policy

SN - 0301-4215

IS - 11

ER -