Introducing a fragmentation perspective on coordination in crisis management

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Coordination theories are characterized primarily by a focus on integration, in which coordination is aimed at achieving a coherent and unified set of actions. However, in the extreme settings in which fast-response organizations operate, achieving integration is often challenging. In this study we employ a fragmentation perspective to show that dealing with ambiguity and discontinuity is not only inevitable for these organizations, it is a key characteristic of coordinating. We undertook an inductive, qualitative field study on how officers in command from the fire department, medical services, and police coordinate during emergency response operations. Our data are based on a four-year multi-site field study of 40 emergency management exercises in the Netherlands, combined with 56 retrospective interviews. Our inductive analysis of this data shows that officers use three coordination practices to deal with ambiguity and discontinuity: working around procedures, delegating tasks, and demarcating expertise. We theorize our findings by showing how these practices lead to conditions in which fragmentation can become an effective method of coordination. In doing so, we provide a more complete understanding of the process of coordinating in fast-response settings that will benefit both crisis management practice and organizational theory.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1521-1546
Number of pages26
JournalOrganization Studies
Volume39
Issue number11
Early online date31 Aug 2017
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Nov 2018

Fingerprint

Law enforcement
Fires
Fragmentation
Crisis management
Field study
Discontinuity
Management practices
Police
Expertise
Emergency management
Organizational theory
Practice theory
Emergency response
The Netherlands
Exercise
Coordination theory
Medical services

Keywords

  • Coordination
  • Fragmentation
  • Boundaries
  • Sensemaking
  • Crisis Management

Cite this

@article{1827f8d7e03e4adabd99f8c5aea24d86,
title = "Introducing a fragmentation perspective on coordination in crisis management",
abstract = "Coordination theories are characterized primarily by a focus on integration, in which coordination is aimed at achieving a coherent and unified set of actions. However, in the extreme settings in which fast-response organizations operate, achieving integration is often challenging. In this study we employ a fragmentation perspective to show that dealing with ambiguity and discontinuity is not only inevitable for these organizations, it is a key characteristic of coordinating. We undertook an inductive, qualitative field study on how officers in command from the fire department, medical services, and police coordinate during emergency response operations. Our data are based on a four-year multi-site field study of 40 emergency management exercises in the Netherlands, combined with 56 retrospective interviews. Our inductive analysis of this data shows that officers use three coordination practices to deal with ambiguity and discontinuity: working around procedures, delegating tasks, and demarcating expertise. We theorize our findings by showing how these practices lead to conditions in which fragmentation can become an effective method of coordination. In doing so, we provide a more complete understanding of the process of coordinating in fast-response settings that will benefit both crisis management practice and organizational theory.",
keywords = "Coordination, Fragmentation, Boundaries, Sensemaking, Crisis Management",
author = "J.J. Wolbers and F.K. Boersma and P. Groenewegen",
year = "2018",
month = "11",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/0170840617717095",
language = "English",
volume = "39",
pages = "1521--1546",
journal = "Organization Studies",
issn = "1741-3044",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Ltd",
number = "11",

}

Introducing a fragmentation perspective on coordination in crisis management. / Wolbers, J.J.; Boersma, F.K.; Groenewegen, P.

In: Organization Studies, Vol. 39, No. 11, 01.11.2018, p. 1521-1546.

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Introducing a fragmentation perspective on coordination in crisis management

AU - Wolbers, J.J.

AU - Boersma, F.K.

AU - Groenewegen, P.

PY - 2018/11/1

Y1 - 2018/11/1

N2 - Coordination theories are characterized primarily by a focus on integration, in which coordination is aimed at achieving a coherent and unified set of actions. However, in the extreme settings in which fast-response organizations operate, achieving integration is often challenging. In this study we employ a fragmentation perspective to show that dealing with ambiguity and discontinuity is not only inevitable for these organizations, it is a key characteristic of coordinating. We undertook an inductive, qualitative field study on how officers in command from the fire department, medical services, and police coordinate during emergency response operations. Our data are based on a four-year multi-site field study of 40 emergency management exercises in the Netherlands, combined with 56 retrospective interviews. Our inductive analysis of this data shows that officers use three coordination practices to deal with ambiguity and discontinuity: working around procedures, delegating tasks, and demarcating expertise. We theorize our findings by showing how these practices lead to conditions in which fragmentation can become an effective method of coordination. In doing so, we provide a more complete understanding of the process of coordinating in fast-response settings that will benefit both crisis management practice and organizational theory.

AB - Coordination theories are characterized primarily by a focus on integration, in which coordination is aimed at achieving a coherent and unified set of actions. However, in the extreme settings in which fast-response organizations operate, achieving integration is often challenging. In this study we employ a fragmentation perspective to show that dealing with ambiguity and discontinuity is not only inevitable for these organizations, it is a key characteristic of coordinating. We undertook an inductive, qualitative field study on how officers in command from the fire department, medical services, and police coordinate during emergency response operations. Our data are based on a four-year multi-site field study of 40 emergency management exercises in the Netherlands, combined with 56 retrospective interviews. Our inductive analysis of this data shows that officers use three coordination practices to deal with ambiguity and discontinuity: working around procedures, delegating tasks, and demarcating expertise. We theorize our findings by showing how these practices lead to conditions in which fragmentation can become an effective method of coordination. In doing so, we provide a more complete understanding of the process of coordinating in fast-response settings that will benefit both crisis management practice and organizational theory.

KW - Coordination

KW - Fragmentation

KW - Boundaries

KW - Sensemaking

KW - Crisis Management

U2 - 10.1177/0170840617717095

DO - 10.1177/0170840617717095

M3 - Article

VL - 39

SP - 1521

EP - 1546

JO - Organization Studies

JF - Organization Studies

SN - 1741-3044

IS - 11

ER -