Introducing a science interest network model to reveal country differences

Maien SM Sachisthal, Brenda RJ Jansen, Thea TD Peetsma, Jonas Dalege, Han LJ van der Maas, Maartje EJ Raijmakers

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

In this article, a science interest network model (SINM) is introduced and a first empirical test of the model is presented. The SINM models interest as a dynamic relational construct, in which different interest components, that is, affective, behavioral, and cognitive components and related motivational components mutually reinforce one another within the development of interest. The dynamical relational perspective hypothesizes that the mutual interactions between interest components underlie the development of interest. Applying the SINM to the PISA 2015 data of 2 countries, that is, the Netherlands and Colombia, we were able to not only illuminate the structure of interactions between the different variables (i.e., indicators) in the networks of different groups of adolescents but we could also make predictions about which variables are of structural importance within the interest construct and as such worthwhile to test as potential candidates for intervention. Additionally, we were able to replicate earlier findings of the literature, namely that (a) enjoyment is central within the interest network and that (b) important structural differences exist in the interest network across countries, which, for instance, point to differences in domain specificity of interest between countries. While the network approach is sensitive to structural differences in science interest across countries, the network structure is stable across subgroups within countries. Future studies are proposed to test theoretically important assumptions of a dynamical perspective on interest, such as the causal role of different interest components in the development of interest.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1063-1080
Number of pages18
JournalJournal of Educational Psychology
Volume111
Issue number6
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2018

Fingerprint

science
Colombia
Netherlands
interaction
candidacy
adolescent

Cite this

Sachisthal, M. SM., Jansen, B. RJ., Peetsma, T. TD., Dalege, J., van der Maas, H. LJ., & Raijmakers, M. EJ. (2018). Introducing a science interest network model to reveal country differences. Journal of Educational Psychology, 111(6), 1063-1080. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000327
Sachisthal, Maien SM ; Jansen, Brenda RJ ; Peetsma, Thea TD ; Dalege, Jonas ; van der Maas, Han LJ ; Raijmakers, Maartje EJ. / Introducing a science interest network model to reveal country differences. In: Journal of Educational Psychology. 2018 ; Vol. 111, No. 6. pp. 1063-1080.
@article{2b5724e77fd6463caa850c0cd05930b4,
title = "Introducing a science interest network model to reveal country differences",
abstract = "In this article, a science interest network model (SINM) is introduced and a first empirical test of the model is presented. The SINM models interest as a dynamic relational construct, in which different interest components, that is, affective, behavioral, and cognitive components and related motivational components mutually reinforce one another within the development of interest. The dynamical relational perspective hypothesizes that the mutual interactions between interest components underlie the development of interest. Applying the SINM to the PISA 2015 data of 2 countries, that is, the Netherlands and Colombia, we were able to not only illuminate the structure of interactions between the different variables (i.e., indicators) in the networks of different groups of adolescents but we could also make predictions about which variables are of structural importance within the interest construct and as such worthwhile to test as potential candidates for intervention. Additionally, we were able to replicate earlier findings of the literature, namely that (a) enjoyment is central within the interest network and that (b) important structural differences exist in the interest network across countries, which, for instance, point to differences in domain specificity of interest between countries. While the network approach is sensitive to structural differences in science interest across countries, the network structure is stable across subgroups within countries. Future studies are proposed to test theoretically important assumptions of a dynamical perspective on interest, such as the causal role of different interest components in the development of interest.",
author = "Sachisthal, {Maien SM} and Jansen, {Brenda RJ} and Peetsma, {Thea TD} and Jonas Dalege and {van der Maas}, {Han LJ} and Raijmakers, {Maartje EJ}",
year = "2018",
doi = "10.1037/edu0000327",
language = "English",
volume = "111",
pages = "1063--1080",
journal = "The Journal of Educational Psychology",
issn = "0022-0663",
publisher = "American Psychological Association",
number = "6",

}

Sachisthal, MSM, Jansen, BRJ, Peetsma, TTD, Dalege, J, van der Maas, HLJ & Raijmakers, MEJ 2018, 'Introducing a science interest network model to reveal country differences' Journal of Educational Psychology, vol. 111, no. 6, pp. 1063-1080. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000327

Introducing a science interest network model to reveal country differences. / Sachisthal, Maien SM; Jansen, Brenda RJ; Peetsma, Thea TD; Dalege, Jonas; van der Maas, Han LJ; Raijmakers, Maartje EJ.

In: Journal of Educational Psychology, Vol. 111, No. 6, 2018, p. 1063-1080.

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Introducing a science interest network model to reveal country differences

AU - Sachisthal, Maien SM

AU - Jansen, Brenda RJ

AU - Peetsma, Thea TD

AU - Dalege, Jonas

AU - van der Maas, Han LJ

AU - Raijmakers, Maartje EJ

PY - 2018

Y1 - 2018

N2 - In this article, a science interest network model (SINM) is introduced and a first empirical test of the model is presented. The SINM models interest as a dynamic relational construct, in which different interest components, that is, affective, behavioral, and cognitive components and related motivational components mutually reinforce one another within the development of interest. The dynamical relational perspective hypothesizes that the mutual interactions between interest components underlie the development of interest. Applying the SINM to the PISA 2015 data of 2 countries, that is, the Netherlands and Colombia, we were able to not only illuminate the structure of interactions between the different variables (i.e., indicators) in the networks of different groups of adolescents but we could also make predictions about which variables are of structural importance within the interest construct and as such worthwhile to test as potential candidates for intervention. Additionally, we were able to replicate earlier findings of the literature, namely that (a) enjoyment is central within the interest network and that (b) important structural differences exist in the interest network across countries, which, for instance, point to differences in domain specificity of interest between countries. While the network approach is sensitive to structural differences in science interest across countries, the network structure is stable across subgroups within countries. Future studies are proposed to test theoretically important assumptions of a dynamical perspective on interest, such as the causal role of different interest components in the development of interest.

AB - In this article, a science interest network model (SINM) is introduced and a first empirical test of the model is presented. The SINM models interest as a dynamic relational construct, in which different interest components, that is, affective, behavioral, and cognitive components and related motivational components mutually reinforce one another within the development of interest. The dynamical relational perspective hypothesizes that the mutual interactions between interest components underlie the development of interest. Applying the SINM to the PISA 2015 data of 2 countries, that is, the Netherlands and Colombia, we were able to not only illuminate the structure of interactions between the different variables (i.e., indicators) in the networks of different groups of adolescents but we could also make predictions about which variables are of structural importance within the interest construct and as such worthwhile to test as potential candidates for intervention. Additionally, we were able to replicate earlier findings of the literature, namely that (a) enjoyment is central within the interest network and that (b) important structural differences exist in the interest network across countries, which, for instance, point to differences in domain specificity of interest between countries. While the network approach is sensitive to structural differences in science interest across countries, the network structure is stable across subgroups within countries. Future studies are proposed to test theoretically important assumptions of a dynamical perspective on interest, such as the causal role of different interest components in the development of interest.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85058420428&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85058420428&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1037/edu0000327

DO - 10.1037/edu0000327

M3 - Article

VL - 111

SP - 1063

EP - 1080

JO - The Journal of Educational Psychology

JF - The Journal of Educational Psychology

SN - 0022-0663

IS - 6

ER -