Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

“Invited and uninvited public participation, and why both matter: Dutch lessons from the past

Research output: Contribution to Conference › Paper › Academic

Abstract

The European Faro Convention emphasizes the importance of public participation.
Processes of public participation influence the built environment, when citizens engage in heritage projects in their surroundings. Currently, participation in heritage involves an interaction of a government with an invited group of citizens. Participation practices emerged during the nineteen sixties and so far, have been difficult. Recent historic research provides insights in public participation in the built environment, yet these studies are limited to ‘invited’ forms of participation. In this paper, we propose that it is important to consider also
‘uninvited’ acts of civic engagement, and that examining historic Dutch cases adds
importantly to our knowledge of public participation.
Especially during the late nineteen sixties and nineteen seventies, Dutch city officials were confronted with activist citizen groups. In reaction to city renewal plans, citizens protested the changes of their urban environment, often by intervening in their neighbourhoods. These protests and interventions provide important information about the values citizens assign to their environment. These ‘uninvited’ interactions, however, have never been interpreted as participation, even though true participation comes forth from autonomy.
In this paper, we study public participation in the built environment by analysing three historical Dutch cases from the 1970s of ‘invited’ and ‘uninvited’ public participation. Moreover, we address the lessons learned in relation to public participation in community heritage. In this study the ‘approval’ of government bodies is not be used as a criterium to distinguish between acts of official participation versus autonomous acts. The (un)invited forms of participation are not seen as unwanted interventions by unwarranted actors, but rather as indicators of citizen’s unfulfilled needs in which citizens try to signal or amend these needs.
Original languageEnglish
Publication statusPublished - 31 Jan 2024
EventFaro Convention International Conference 2024: Transforming through co creation: participatory heritage practices tackling urban challenges - Portugal, Porto
Duration: 29 Jan 2024 → 2 Feb 2024

Conference

ConferenceFaro Convention International Conference 2024
Abbreviated titleFCIC24
CityPorto
Period29/01/24 → 2/02/24

Keywords

  • participation
  • architecture
  • urban planning
  • co-creation

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of '“Invited and uninvited public participation, and why both matter: Dutch lessons from the past'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this