Irrelevant insights make worldviews ring true

Ruben E. Laukkonen*, Benjamin T. Kaveladze, John Protzko, Jason M. Tangen, William von Hippel, Jonathan W. Schooler

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Our basic beliefs about reality can be impossible to prove and yet we can feel a strong intuitive conviction about them, as exemplified by insights that imbue an idea with immediate certainty. Here we presented participants with worldview beliefs such as “people’s core qualities are fixed” and simultaneously elicited an aha moment. In the first experiment (N = 3000, which included a direct replication), participants rated worldview beliefs as truer when they solved anagrams and also experienced aha moments. A second experiment (N = 1564) showed that the worldview statement and the aha moment must be perceived simultaneously for this ‘insight misattribution’ effect to occur. These results demonstrate that artificially induced aha moments can make worldview beliefs seem truer, possibly because humans partially rely on feelings of insight to appraise an idea’s veracity. Feelings of insight are therefore not epiphenomenal and should be investigated for their effects on decisions, beliefs, and delusions.

Original languageEnglish
Article number2075
Pages (from-to)1-9
Number of pages9
JournalScientific Reports
Volume12
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 8 Feb 2022

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2022, The Author(s).

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Irrelevant insights make worldviews ring true'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this