Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Is Australia weird? A cross-continental comparison of biological, geological and climatological features

  • Habacuc Flores-Moreno
  • , Rhiannon L. Dalrymple
  • , Will K. Cornwell
  • , Gordana Popovic
  • , Shinichi Nakagawa
  • , Joe Atkinson*
  • , Julia Cooke
  • , Shawn W. Laffan
  • , Stephen P. Bonser
  • , Lisa E. Schwanz
  • , Angela J. Crean
  • , David J. Eldridge
  • , Michael Garratt
  • , Robert C. Brooks
  • , Adriana Vergés
  • , Alistair G.B. Poore
  • , David R. Cohen
  • , Graeme F. Clark
  • , Alex Sen Gupta
  • , Peter B. Reich
  • J. Hans C. Cornelissen, Joseph M. Craine, Frank A. Hemmings, Jens Kattge, Ülo Niinemets, Josep Peñuelas, Angela T. Moles
*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Australia’s distinctive biogeography means that it is sometimes considered an ecologically unique continent with biological and abiotic features that are not comparable to those observed in the rest of the world. This leaves some researchers unclear as to whether findings from Australia apply to systems elsewhere (or vice-versa), which has consequences for the development of ecological theory and the application of ecological management principles. We analyzed 594,612 observations spanning 85 variables describing global climate, soil, geochemistry, plants, animals, and ecosystem function to test if Australia is broadly different to the other continents and compare how different each continent is from the global mean. We found significant differences between Australian and global means for none of 15 climate variables, only seven of 25 geochemistry variables, three of 16 soil variables, five of 12 plant trait variables, four of 11 animal variables, and one of five ecosystem function variables. Seven of these differences remained significant when we adjusted for multiple hypothesis testing: high soil pH, high soil concentrations of sodium and strontium, a high proportion of nitrogen-fixing plants, low plant leaf nitrogen concentration, low annual production rate to birth in mammals, and low marine productivity. Our analyses reveal numerous similarities between Australia and Africa and highlight dissimilarities between continents in the northern vs. southern hemispheres. Australia ranked the most distinctive continent for 26 variables, more often than Europe (15 variables), Africa (13 variables), Asia (12 variables each), South America (11 variables) or North America (8 variables). Australia was distinctive in a range of soil conditions and plant traits, and a few bird and mammal traits, tending to sit at a more extreme end of variation for some variables related to resource availability. However, combined analyses revealed that, overall, Australia is not significantly more different to the global mean than Africa, South America, or Europe. In conclusion, while Australia does have some unique and distinctive features, this is also true for each of the other continents, and the data do not support the idea that Australia is an overall outlier in its biotic or abiotic characteristics.

Original languageEnglish
Article number1073842
Pages (from-to)1-10
Number of pages10
JournalFrontiers in Ecology and Evolution
Volume11
Early online date19 May 2023
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2023

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
Copyright © 2023 Flores-Moreno, Dalrymple, Cornwell, Popovic, Nakagawa, Atkinson, Cooke, Laffan, Bonser, Schwanz, Crean, Eldridge, Garratt, Brooks, Vergés, Poore, Cohen, Clark, Sen Gupta, Reich, Cornelissen, Craine, Hemmings, Kattge, Niinemets, Peñuelas and Moles.

Funding

AM was supported by funding from the Australian Research Council (DP140102861). This study was funded by the U.S. National Science Foundation (NSF) Long-Term Ecological Research program (DEB-1234162) at the Cedar Creek LTER site. \u00DCN was supported by the Estonian Ministry of Science and Education (institutional grant IUT-8-3) and European Commission through European Regional Development Fund (Center of Excellence EcolChange). JP was supported by the European Research Council Synergy grant ERC-2013-SyG-610028 IMBALANCE-P. The study has been supported by the TRY initiative on plant traits ( http://www.try-db.org ). TRY is currently supported by DIVERSITAS/Future Earth and the German Centre for Integrative Biodiversity Research (iDiv) Halle-Jena-Leipzig.

FundersFunder number
National Science Foundation
Deutsches Zentrum für integrative Biodiversitätsforschung Halle-Jena-Leipzig
Long-Term Ecological Research program
European Commission
German Centre for Integrative Biodiversity Research
European Research Council
European Regional Development Fund
Center of Excellence EcolChange
Australian Research CouncilDP140102861
Estonian Ministry of Science and EducationIUT-8-3
Seventh Framework Programme1234162, 610028
National Stroke FoundationDEB-1234162

    Keywords

    • biological
    • climatological
    • continent
    • geological
    • global comparison
    • macroecology

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Is Australia weird? A cross-continental comparison of biological, geological and climatological features'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this