Is comfort food actually comforting for emotional eaters? A (moderated) mediation analysis

Tatjana van Strien, E. Leigh Gibson, Rosa Baños, Ausiàs Cebolla, Laura H.H. Winkens

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

An important but unreplicated earlier finding on comfort eating was that the association between food intake and immediate mood improvement appeared to be mediated by the palatability of the food, and that this effect was more pronounced for high than for low emotional eaters [26]. This has not yet been formally tested using mediation and moderated mediation analysis. We conducted these analyses using data from two experiments on non-obese female students (n = 29 and n = 74). Mood and eating satisfaction in Study 1, and mood, tastiness and emotional eating in Study 2 were all self-reported. In Study 1, using a sad mood induction procedure, emotional eaters ate more food, and when mood was assessed immediately after food intake, ‘eating satisfaction’ acted as mediator between food intake and mood improvement (decrease in sadness or increase in happiness). In Study 2, where we measured the difference in actual food intake after a control or a stress task (modified Trier Social Stress Test), and assessed mood during the food intake after stress, we found significant moderated mediation. As expected, there was a significant positive mediation effect of tastiness between food intake and mood improvement in the high emotional eaters, but also a significant negative mediation effect of tastiness between food intake and mood improvement in the low emotional eaters. This suggests that tastiness promotes ‘comfort’ from food in female emotional eaters, but conflicts in non-emotional eaters with a tendency to eat less when stressed. In conclusion, palatable food may indeed provide comfort specifically for high emotional eaters during eating.

Original languageEnglish
Article number112671
Pages (from-to)1-10
Number of pages10
JournalPhysiology and Behavior
Volume211
Early online date1 Sep 2019
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Nov 2019

Fingerprint

Eating
Food
Happiness
Exercise Test
Students

Keywords

  • Eating satisfaction
  • Food, mood, emotional eating
  • Tastiness

Cite this

van Strien, T., Gibson, E. L., Baños, R., Cebolla, A., & Winkens, L. H. H. (2019). Is comfort food actually comforting for emotional eaters? A (moderated) mediation analysis. Physiology and Behavior, 211, 1-10. [112671]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physbeh.2019.112671
van Strien, Tatjana ; Gibson, E. Leigh ; Baños, Rosa ; Cebolla, Ausiàs ; Winkens, Laura H.H. / Is comfort food actually comforting for emotional eaters? A (moderated) mediation analysis. In: Physiology and Behavior. 2019 ; Vol. 211. pp. 1-10.
@article{ac50790d57734bbb8e92a92c5eacbffb,
title = "Is comfort food actually comforting for emotional eaters? A (moderated) mediation analysis",
abstract = "An important but unreplicated earlier finding on comfort eating was that the association between food intake and immediate mood improvement appeared to be mediated by the palatability of the food, and that this effect was more pronounced for high than for low emotional eaters [26]. This has not yet been formally tested using mediation and moderated mediation analysis. We conducted these analyses using data from two experiments on non-obese female students (n = 29 and n = 74). Mood and eating satisfaction in Study 1, and mood, tastiness and emotional eating in Study 2 were all self-reported. In Study 1, using a sad mood induction procedure, emotional eaters ate more food, and when mood was assessed immediately after food intake, ‘eating satisfaction’ acted as mediator between food intake and mood improvement (decrease in sadness or increase in happiness). In Study 2, where we measured the difference in actual food intake after a control or a stress task (modified Trier Social Stress Test), and assessed mood during the food intake after stress, we found significant moderated mediation. As expected, there was a significant positive mediation effect of tastiness between food intake and mood improvement in the high emotional eaters, but also a significant negative mediation effect of tastiness between food intake and mood improvement in the low emotional eaters. This suggests that tastiness promotes ‘comfort’ from food in female emotional eaters, but conflicts in non-emotional eaters with a tendency to eat less when stressed. In conclusion, palatable food may indeed provide comfort specifically for high emotional eaters during eating.",
keywords = "Eating satisfaction, Food, mood, emotional eating, Tastiness",
author = "{van Strien}, Tatjana and Gibson, {E. Leigh} and Rosa Ba{\~n}os and Ausi{\`a}s Cebolla and Winkens, {Laura H.H.}",
year = "2019",
month = "11",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.physbeh.2019.112671",
language = "English",
volume = "211",
pages = "1--10",
journal = "Physiology and Behavior",
issn = "0031-9384",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",

}

Is comfort food actually comforting for emotional eaters? A (moderated) mediation analysis. / van Strien, Tatjana; Gibson, E. Leigh; Baños, Rosa; Cebolla, Ausiàs; Winkens, Laura H.H.

In: Physiology and Behavior, Vol. 211, 112671, 01.11.2019, p. 1-10.

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Is comfort food actually comforting for emotional eaters? A (moderated) mediation analysis

AU - van Strien, Tatjana

AU - Gibson, E. Leigh

AU - Baños, Rosa

AU - Cebolla, Ausiàs

AU - Winkens, Laura H.H.

PY - 2019/11/1

Y1 - 2019/11/1

N2 - An important but unreplicated earlier finding on comfort eating was that the association between food intake and immediate mood improvement appeared to be mediated by the palatability of the food, and that this effect was more pronounced for high than for low emotional eaters [26]. This has not yet been formally tested using mediation and moderated mediation analysis. We conducted these analyses using data from two experiments on non-obese female students (n = 29 and n = 74). Mood and eating satisfaction in Study 1, and mood, tastiness and emotional eating in Study 2 were all self-reported. In Study 1, using a sad mood induction procedure, emotional eaters ate more food, and when mood was assessed immediately after food intake, ‘eating satisfaction’ acted as mediator between food intake and mood improvement (decrease in sadness or increase in happiness). In Study 2, where we measured the difference in actual food intake after a control or a stress task (modified Trier Social Stress Test), and assessed mood during the food intake after stress, we found significant moderated mediation. As expected, there was a significant positive mediation effect of tastiness between food intake and mood improvement in the high emotional eaters, but also a significant negative mediation effect of tastiness between food intake and mood improvement in the low emotional eaters. This suggests that tastiness promotes ‘comfort’ from food in female emotional eaters, but conflicts in non-emotional eaters with a tendency to eat less when stressed. In conclusion, palatable food may indeed provide comfort specifically for high emotional eaters during eating.

AB - An important but unreplicated earlier finding on comfort eating was that the association between food intake and immediate mood improvement appeared to be mediated by the palatability of the food, and that this effect was more pronounced for high than for low emotional eaters [26]. This has not yet been formally tested using mediation and moderated mediation analysis. We conducted these analyses using data from two experiments on non-obese female students (n = 29 and n = 74). Mood and eating satisfaction in Study 1, and mood, tastiness and emotional eating in Study 2 were all self-reported. In Study 1, using a sad mood induction procedure, emotional eaters ate more food, and when mood was assessed immediately after food intake, ‘eating satisfaction’ acted as mediator between food intake and mood improvement (decrease in sadness or increase in happiness). In Study 2, where we measured the difference in actual food intake after a control or a stress task (modified Trier Social Stress Test), and assessed mood during the food intake after stress, we found significant moderated mediation. As expected, there was a significant positive mediation effect of tastiness between food intake and mood improvement in the high emotional eaters, but also a significant negative mediation effect of tastiness between food intake and mood improvement in the low emotional eaters. This suggests that tastiness promotes ‘comfort’ from food in female emotional eaters, but conflicts in non-emotional eaters with a tendency to eat less when stressed. In conclusion, palatable food may indeed provide comfort specifically for high emotional eaters during eating.

KW - Eating satisfaction

KW - Food, mood, emotional eating

KW - Tastiness

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85071832669&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85071832669&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.physbeh.2019.112671

DO - 10.1016/j.physbeh.2019.112671

M3 - Article

VL - 211

SP - 1

EP - 10

JO - Physiology and Behavior

JF - Physiology and Behavior

SN - 0031-9384

M1 - 112671

ER -