Is Dooyeweerd a panentheist? – Comments on Friesen’s ’95 theses on Herman Dooyeweerd’

G. Glas

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

This paper critically reviews Glenn Friesen's '95 theses on Herman Dooyeweerd' (his journal). I acknowledge Friesen’s theses as an intriguing contribution to the ongoing
debate on Dooyeweerd’s systematic philosophy. Friesen’s panentheist interpretation
of Dooyeweerd has to be rejected, but Friesen’s work has the merit of
making us aware of certain aspects of Dooyeweerd’s thought that might give
rise to such interpretation. The degree of detail with which this interpretation
is supported adds to the value of his contribution.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)129-141
JournalPhilosophia Reformata
Volume74
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2009

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Is Dooyeweerd a panentheist? – Comments on Friesen’s ’95 theses on Herman Dooyeweerd’'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this