TY - JOUR
T1 - Is guided self-help as effective as face-to-face psychotherapy for depression and anxiety disorders? A systematic review and meta-analysis of comparative outcome studies
AU - Cuijpers, P.
AU - Donker, T.
AU - van Straten, A.
AU - Li, J.
AU - Andersson, G.
PY - 2010
Y1 - 2010
N2 - Background Although guided self-help for depression and anxiety disorders has been examined in many studies, it is not clear whether it is equally effective as face-to-face treatments.Method We conducted a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials in which the effects of guided self-help on depression and anxiety were compared directly with face-to-face psychotherapies for depression and anxiety disorders. A systematic search in bibliographical databases (PubMed, PsycINFO, EMBASE, Cochrane) resulted in 21 studies with 810 participants.Results The overall effect size indicating the difference between guided self-help and face-to-face psychotherapy at post-test was d=0.02, in favour of guided self-help. At follow-up (up to 1 year) no significant difference was found either. No significant difference was found between the drop-out rates in the two treatments formats.Conclusions It seems safe to conclude that guided self-help and face-to-face treatments can have comparable effects. It is time to start thinking about implementation in routine care. © 2010 Cambridge University Press.
AB - Background Although guided self-help for depression and anxiety disorders has been examined in many studies, it is not clear whether it is equally effective as face-to-face treatments.Method We conducted a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials in which the effects of guided self-help on depression and anxiety were compared directly with face-to-face psychotherapies for depression and anxiety disorders. A systematic search in bibliographical databases (PubMed, PsycINFO, EMBASE, Cochrane) resulted in 21 studies with 810 participants.Results The overall effect size indicating the difference between guided self-help and face-to-face psychotherapy at post-test was d=0.02, in favour of guided self-help. At follow-up (up to 1 year) no significant difference was found either. No significant difference was found between the drop-out rates in the two treatments formats.Conclusions It seems safe to conclude that guided self-help and face-to-face treatments can have comparable effects. It is time to start thinking about implementation in routine care. © 2010 Cambridge University Press.
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/78650311210
UR - https://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=78650311210&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1017/S0033291710000772
DO - 10.1017/S0033291710000772
M3 - Article
SN - 0033-2917
VL - 40
SP - 1943
EP - 1957
JO - Psychological Medicine
JF - Psychological Medicine
IS - 12
ER -