Is guided self-help as effective as face-to-face psychotherapy for depression and anxiety disorders? A systematic review and meta-analysis of comparative outcome studies

P. Cuijpers, T. Donker, A. van Straten, J. Li, G. Andersson

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Background Although guided self-help for depression and anxiety disorders has been examined in many studies, it is not clear whether it is equally effective as face-to-face treatments.Method We conducted a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials in which the effects of guided self-help on depression and anxiety were compared directly with face-to-face psychotherapies for depression and anxiety disorders. A systematic search in bibliographical databases (PubMed, PsycINFO, EMBASE, Cochrane) resulted in 21 studies with 810 participants.Results The overall effect size indicating the difference between guided self-help and face-to-face psychotherapy at post-test was d=0.02, in favour of guided self-help. At follow-up (up to 1 year) no significant difference was found either. No significant difference was found between the drop-out rates in the two treatments formats.Conclusions It seems safe to conclude that guided self-help and face-to-face treatments can have comparable effects. It is time to start thinking about implementation in routine care. © 2010 Cambridge University Press.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1943-1957
JournalPsychological Medicine
Volume40
Issue number12
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2010

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Is guided self-help as effective as face-to-face psychotherapy for depression and anxiety disorders? A systematic review and meta-analysis of comparative outcome studies'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this