Abstract
In this article, we present results from a study of how varying e-mail ‘‘cover letters’’
in the implementation of an online survey can influence response rates. Historically,
there is little evidence that the content of survey cover letters has a strong effect on
response rates in off-line survey environments (Harvey, 1987), although empirical
research on this question is limited and some research has pointed to small, but
significant, effects due to varying letter content (see Brennan, 1992; Redline,
Oliver, & Fecso, 2004). Online self-completion surveys differ from paper versions
in that the link that survey targets must click on to complete the survey is embedded
in the ‘‘cover letter’’ e-mail. As such, we have reason to suspect that the content of
such e-mails may affect the likelihood that targets respond to the survey and influence
the quality of the responses that they provide.
in the implementation of an online survey can influence response rates. Historically,
there is little evidence that the content of survey cover letters has a strong effect on
response rates in off-line survey environments (Harvey, 1987), although empirical
research on this question is limited and some research has pointed to small, but
significant, effects due to varying letter content (see Brennan, 1992; Redline,
Oliver, & Fecso, 2004). Online self-completion surveys differ from paper versions
in that the link that survey targets must click on to complete the survey is embedded
in the ‘‘cover letter’’ e-mail. As such, we have reason to suspect that the content of
such e-mails may affect the likelihood that targets respond to the survey and influence
the quality of the responses that they provide.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Article number | 6 |
Pages (from-to) | 235-244 |
Number of pages | 10 |
Journal | International Journal of Public Opinion Research |
Volume | 26 |
Issue number | 2 |
Early online date | 13 Jul 2013 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 2014 |