Abstract
Cross-topic stance detection is the task to automatically detect stances (pro, against, or neutral) on unseen topics. We successfully reproduce state-of-the-art cross-topic stance detection work (Reimers et al., 2019), and systematically analyze its reproducibility. Our attention then turns to the cross-topic aspect of this work, and the specificity of topics in terms of vocabulary and socio-cultural context. We ask: To what extent is stance detection topic-independent and generalizable across topics? We compare the model’s performance on various unseen topics, and find topic (e.g. abortion, cloning), class (e.g. pro, con), and their interaction affecting the model’s performance. We conclude that investigating performance on different topics, and addressing topic-specific vocabulary and context, is a future avenue for cross-topic stance detection.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Title of host publication | Proceedings of the 8th Workshop on Argument Mining [ArgMining 2021] |
Editors | Khalid Al-Khatib, Yufang Hou, Manfred Stede |
Place of Publication | Punta Cana, the Dominican Republic |
Publisher | Association for Computational Linguistics, ACL Anthology |
Pages | 46-56 |
Number of pages | 10 |
ISBN (Electronic) | 9781954085923 |
Publication status | Published - Nov 2021 |
Event | 8th Workshop on Argument Mining, ArgMining 2021 - Virtual, Punta Cana, Dominican Republic Duration: 10 Nov 2021 → 11 Nov 2021 |
Conference
Conference | 8th Workshop on Argument Mining, ArgMining 2021 |
---|---|
Country/Territory | Dominican Republic |
City | Virtual, Punta Cana |
Period | 10/11/21 → 11/11/21 |
Bibliographical note
Funding Information:This research is funded through Open Competition Digitalization Humanities and Social Science grant nr 406.D1.19.073 awarded by the Netherlands Organization of Scientific Research (NWO). Our computing was done through SURF Research Cloud, a national supercomputer infrastructure in the Netherlands also funded by the NWO. We would like to thank dr. Nils Reimers for sending us their paper’s data. We would also like to thank the anonymous reviewers, whose very helpful comments improved the paper. All opinions and remaining errors are our own.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 Association for Computational Linguistics.