Abstract
This paper focuses on the competitive analysis of scheduling disciplines in a large deviations setting. Although there are policies that are known to optimize the sojourn time tail under a large class of heavy-tailed job sizes (e.g., processor sharing and shortest remaining processing time) and there are policies known to optimize the sojourn time tail in the case of light-tailed job sizes (e.g., first come first served), no policies are known that can optimize the sojourn time tail across both light- and heavy-tailed job size distributions. We prove that no such work-conserving, nonanticipatory, nonlearning policy exists, and thus that a policy must learn (or know) the job size distribution in order to optimize the sojourn time tail. © 2012 INFORMS.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 1249-1257 |
| Journal | Operations Research |
| Volume | 60 |
| Issue number | 5 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 2012 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 8 Decent Work and Economic Growth
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Is tail-optimal scheduling possible?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver