Is there really a relevant difference between tenotomy and tenodesis for tendinopathy of the long head of the biceps?

D. F.P. van Deurzen; N. Gurnani; M. P.J. van den Bekerom

doi:10.1007/s00402-015-2390-8

Is there really a relevant difference between tenotomy and tenodesis for tendinopathy of the long head of the biceps?

D. F.P. van Deurzen, N. Gurnani^*, M. P.J. van den Bekerom

^*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to Journal › Letter › Academic › peer-review

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	295-296
Number of pages	2
Journal	Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery
Volume	136
Issue number	2
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-015-2390-8
Publication status	Published - 1 Feb 2016
Externally published	Yes

Access to Document

10.1007/s00402-015-2390-8

Cite this

@article{ea756910307e4f16a49f4c3884e34549,

title = "Is there really a relevant difference between tenotomy and tenodesis for tendinopathy of the long head of the biceps?",

author = "{van Deurzen}, {D. F.P.} and N. Gurnani and {van den Bekerom}, {M. P.J.}",

year = "2016",

month = feb,

day = "1",

doi = "10.1007/s00402-015-2390-8",

language = "English",

volume = "136",

pages = "295--296",

journal = "Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery",

issn = "0936-8051",