Is there still collusion in the Dutch Waste Collection Market?

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Concentration indexes based on regional markets show that the Dutch market for refuse collection is highly concentrated in 2002 and 2010. Similar to earlier work in 2007, the results indicate some evidence that high concentration increases costs and therefore (partly) offsets the advantage of contracting out. In 2002, results with respect to concentration are somewhat less robust. In 2010, the cost-advantage effect of private provision becomes smaller. However, for this year, we have a stronger indication that the cost advantage of private provision depends negatively on regional concentration measured by the Hirschman–Herfindahl Index.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)689-697
JournalLocal Government Studies
Volume42
Issue number5
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2016

Fingerprint

private provision
market
refuse
costs
cost
indication
evidence
waste collection
index
effect
cost increase

Cite this

@article{8f9e3a935f63411e98ed5737cdbd339d,
title = "Is there still collusion in the Dutch Waste Collection Market?",
abstract = "Concentration indexes based on regional markets show that the Dutch market for refuse collection is highly concentrated in 2002 and 2010. Similar to earlier work in 2007, the results indicate some evidence that high concentration increases costs and therefore (partly) offsets the advantage of contracting out. In 2002, results with respect to concentration are somewhat less robust. In 2010, the cost-advantage effect of private provision becomes smaller. However, for this year, we have a stronger indication that the cost advantage of private provision depends negatively on regional concentration measured by the Hirschman–Herfindahl Index.",
author = "R.H.J.M. Gradus and E. Dijkgraaf and M. Schoute",
year = "2016",
doi = "10.1080/03003930.2016.1194267",
language = "English",
volume = "42",
pages = "689--697",
journal = "Local Government Studies",
issn = "0300-3930",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "5",

}

Is there still collusion in the Dutch Waste Collection Market? / Gradus, R.H.J.M.; Dijkgraaf, E.; Schoute, M.

In: Local Government Studies, Vol. 42, No. 5, 2016, p. 689-697.

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Is there still collusion in the Dutch Waste Collection Market?

AU - Gradus, R.H.J.M.

AU - Dijkgraaf, E.

AU - Schoute, M.

PY - 2016

Y1 - 2016

N2 - Concentration indexes based on regional markets show that the Dutch market for refuse collection is highly concentrated in 2002 and 2010. Similar to earlier work in 2007, the results indicate some evidence that high concentration increases costs and therefore (partly) offsets the advantage of contracting out. In 2002, results with respect to concentration are somewhat less robust. In 2010, the cost-advantage effect of private provision becomes smaller. However, for this year, we have a stronger indication that the cost advantage of private provision depends negatively on regional concentration measured by the Hirschman–Herfindahl Index.

AB - Concentration indexes based on regional markets show that the Dutch market for refuse collection is highly concentrated in 2002 and 2010. Similar to earlier work in 2007, the results indicate some evidence that high concentration increases costs and therefore (partly) offsets the advantage of contracting out. In 2002, results with respect to concentration are somewhat less robust. In 2010, the cost-advantage effect of private provision becomes smaller. However, for this year, we have a stronger indication that the cost advantage of private provision depends negatively on regional concentration measured by the Hirschman–Herfindahl Index.

U2 - 10.1080/03003930.2016.1194267

DO - 10.1080/03003930.2016.1194267

M3 - Article

VL - 42

SP - 689

EP - 697

JO - Local Government Studies

JF - Local Government Studies

SN - 0300-3930

IS - 5

ER -