Is Uber a substitute or complement for public transit?

J.D. Hall, C. Palsson, J. Price

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

© 2018 Elsevier Inc.How Uber affects public transit ridership is a relevant policy question facing cities worldwide. Theoretically, Uber's effect on transit is ambiguous: while Uber is an alternative mode of travel, it can also increase the reach and flexibility of public transit's fixed-route, fixed-schedule service. We estimate the effect of Uber on public transit ridership using a difference-in-differences design that exploits variation across U.S. metropolitan areas in both the intensity of Uber penetration and the timing of Uber entry. We find that Uber is a complement for the average transit agency, increasing ridership by five percent after two years. This average effect masks considerable heterogeneity, with Uber increasing ridership more in larger cities and for smaller transit agencies.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)36-50
JournalJournal of Urban Economics
Volume108
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Nov 2018
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Is Uber a substitute or complement for public transit?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this