Isokinetic strength differences between patients with primary reverse and total shoulder prostheses: Muscle strength quantified with a dynamometer

T.D.W. Alta; H.E.J. Veeger; J.S. de Toledo; T.W.J. Janssen; W.J. Willems

doi:10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2014.08.018

Isokinetic strength differences between patients with primary reverse and total shoulder prostheses: Muscle strength quantified with a dynamometer

T.D.W. Alta
, H.E.J. Veeger
, J.S. de Toledo
, T.W.J. Janssen
, W.J. Willems

Research output: Contribution to Journal › Article › Academic › peer-review

Abstract

Interpretation Shoulders with a total shoulder arthroplasty are stronger. This can be explained by the absence of rotator cuff muscles and (probably) medialized center of rotation in reverse shoulder arthroplasty. The strong correlation between external rotation torques and post-operative Constant-Murley sub-scores demonstrates that external rotation is essential for good clinical functioning in reverse shoulder arthroplasty.

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	965-970
Journal	Clinical Biomechanics
Volume	29
Issue number	9
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2014.08.018
Publication status	Published - 2014

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Access to Document

10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2014.08.018

Persistent URL (handle)

Persistent link

Cite this

@article{337c57a8c1ef4645b0027d9eed4da159,

title = "Isokinetic strength differences between patients with primary reverse and total shoulder prostheses: Muscle strength quantified with a dynamometer",

abstract = "Interpretation Shoulders with a total shoulder arthroplasty are stronger. This can be explained by the absence of rotator cuff muscles and (probably) medialized center of rotation in reverse shoulder arthroplasty. The strong correlation between external rotation torques and post-operative Constant-Murley sub-scores demonstrates that external rotation is essential for good clinical functioning in reverse shoulder arthroplasty.",

author = "T.D.W. Alta and H.E.J. Veeger and \{de Toledo\}, J.S. and T.W.J. Janssen and W.J. Willems",

year = "2014",

doi = "10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2014.08.018",

language = "English",

volume = "29",

pages = "965--970",

journal = "Clinical Biomechanics",

issn = "0268-0033",

publisher = "Elsevier Ltd",

number = "9",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Isokinetic strength differences between patients with primary reverse and total shoulder prostheses: Muscle strength quantified with a dynamometer

AU - Alta, T.D.W.

AU - Veeger, H.E.J.

AU - de Toledo, J.S.

AU - Janssen, T.W.J.

AU - Willems, W.J.

PY - 2014

Y1 - 2014

N2 - Interpretation Shoulders with a total shoulder arthroplasty are stronger. This can be explained by the absence of rotator cuff muscles and (probably) medialized center of rotation in reverse shoulder arthroplasty. The strong correlation between external rotation torques and post-operative Constant-Murley sub-scores demonstrates that external rotation is essential for good clinical functioning in reverse shoulder arthroplasty.

AB - Interpretation Shoulders with a total shoulder arthroplasty are stronger. This can be explained by the absence of rotator cuff muscles and (probably) medialized center of rotation in reverse shoulder arthroplasty. The strong correlation between external rotation torques and post-operative Constant-Murley sub-scores demonstrates that external rotation is essential for good clinical functioning in reverse shoulder arthroplasty.

U2 - 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2014.08.018

DO - 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2014.08.018

M3 - Article

SN - 0268-0033

VL - 29

SP - 965

EP - 970

JO - Clinical Biomechanics

JF - Clinical Biomechanics

IS - 9

ER -

Isokinetic strength differences between patients with primary reverse and total shoulder prostheses: Muscle strength quantified with a dynamometer

Abstract

UN SDGs

Access to Document

Persistent URL (handle)

Fingerprint

Cite this