Jan Lever: Challenging the Role of Typological Thinking in Reformational Views of Biology

Harry Cook, A.C. Flipse

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

This essay analyzes the view of evolution of Jan Lever (1922–2010), founder of the biology department at the Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, and compares his view with those of J.H. Diemer and H. Dooyeweerd. Together with Dooyeweerd, Lever wrote a series of chapters on the species concept in Philosophia Reformata (1948–1950) in which species were defined as constant types. In his book, Creatie en Evolutie (1956), Lever still subscribed to Dooyeweerd’s philosophy but also suggested that it is possible that biological evolution occurred, including that of human beings, and that scientific research can shed light on these processes. Influenced by his idea of individuality structures, Dooyeweerd criticized Lever and suggested that species are constant; that science cannot speak to the topics that Lever discusses. It is argued that Dooyeweerd’s views are influenced by the typological thinking of the time and that reformational thought would benefit from de-emphasizing this aspect of reformational philosophy.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)3-25
Number of pages23
JournalPhilosophia Reformata
Volume82
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2017

Fingerprint

Philosophy
Individuality
Species Concepts
Human Being
Biological Evolution
Thought
Amsterdam

Cite this

@article{3a2bd212492e426f949f72b653e220fd,
title = "Jan Lever: Challenging the Role of Typological Thinking in Reformational Views of Biology",
abstract = "This essay analyzes the view of evolution of Jan Lever (1922–2010), founder of the biology department at the Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, and compares his view with those of J.H. Diemer and H. Dooyeweerd. Together with Dooyeweerd, Lever wrote a series of chapters on the species concept in Philosophia Reformata (1948–1950) in which species were defined as constant types. In his book, Creatie en Evolutie (1956), Lever still subscribed to Dooyeweerd’s philosophy but also suggested that it is possible that biological evolution occurred, including that of human beings, and that scientific research can shed light on these processes. Influenced by his idea of individuality structures, Dooyeweerd criticized Lever and suggested that species are constant; that science cannot speak to the topics that Lever discusses. It is argued that Dooyeweerd’s views are influenced by the typological thinking of the time and that reformational thought would benefit from de-emphasizing this aspect of reformational philosophy.",
author = "Harry Cook and A.C. Flipse",
year = "2017",
doi = "10.1163/23528230-08201002",
language = "English",
volume = "82",
pages = "3--25",
journal = "Philosophia Reformata",
issn = "0031-8035",
publisher = "Brill",
number = "1",

}

Jan Lever: Challenging the Role of Typological Thinking in Reformational Views of Biology. / Cook, Harry ; Flipse, A.C.

In: Philosophia Reformata, Vol. 82, No. 1, 2017, p. 3-25.

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Jan Lever: Challenging the Role of Typological Thinking in Reformational Views of Biology

AU - Cook, Harry

AU - Flipse, A.C.

PY - 2017

Y1 - 2017

N2 - This essay analyzes the view of evolution of Jan Lever (1922–2010), founder of the biology department at the Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, and compares his view with those of J.H. Diemer and H. Dooyeweerd. Together with Dooyeweerd, Lever wrote a series of chapters on the species concept in Philosophia Reformata (1948–1950) in which species were defined as constant types. In his book, Creatie en Evolutie (1956), Lever still subscribed to Dooyeweerd’s philosophy but also suggested that it is possible that biological evolution occurred, including that of human beings, and that scientific research can shed light on these processes. Influenced by his idea of individuality structures, Dooyeweerd criticized Lever and suggested that species are constant; that science cannot speak to the topics that Lever discusses. It is argued that Dooyeweerd’s views are influenced by the typological thinking of the time and that reformational thought would benefit from de-emphasizing this aspect of reformational philosophy.

AB - This essay analyzes the view of evolution of Jan Lever (1922–2010), founder of the biology department at the Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, and compares his view with those of J.H. Diemer and H. Dooyeweerd. Together with Dooyeweerd, Lever wrote a series of chapters on the species concept in Philosophia Reformata (1948–1950) in which species were defined as constant types. In his book, Creatie en Evolutie (1956), Lever still subscribed to Dooyeweerd’s philosophy but also suggested that it is possible that biological evolution occurred, including that of human beings, and that scientific research can shed light on these processes. Influenced by his idea of individuality structures, Dooyeweerd criticized Lever and suggested that species are constant; that science cannot speak to the topics that Lever discusses. It is argued that Dooyeweerd’s views are influenced by the typological thinking of the time and that reformational thought would benefit from de-emphasizing this aspect of reformational philosophy.

UR - http://booksandjournals.brillonline.com/content/journals/10.1163/23528230-08201002

U2 - 10.1163/23528230-08201002

DO - 10.1163/23528230-08201002

M3 - Article

VL - 82

SP - 3

EP - 25

JO - Philosophia Reformata

JF - Philosophia Reformata

SN - 0031-8035

IS - 1

ER -