Justification and Interlaced Knowledge at ATLAS, CERN

P.R. Tuertscher, R. Garud, A. Kumaraswamy

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

We report on a longitudinal study of the emergence of the ATLAS detector, a complex technological system developed at CERN, Geneva. Our data show that the coordination of initial architectural choices was driven by cycles of contestation and justification that resulted in the creation of what we term interlaced knowledge-pockets of shared knowledge interwoven within and across subsystem communities at ATLAS. We also found that these justifications were possible because of the presence of a boundary infrastructure that served as a common substrate of knowledge for all ATLAS participants. Together, the boundary infrastructure and interlaced knowledge enabled participants to make co-oriented technological choices, address latent interdependencies, and minimize the incidence and severity of glitches when integrating the various subsystems.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1579-1608
JournalOrganization Science
Volume25
Issue number6
Early online date2 Apr 2014
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2014

Fingerprint

Detectors
Substrates
Subsystem
Justification
Substrate
Severity
Interdependencies
Longitudinal study
Technological systems
Shared knowledge

Cite this

Tuertscher, P.R. ; Garud, R. ; Kumaraswamy, A. / Justification and Interlaced Knowledge at ATLAS, CERN. In: Organization Science. 2014 ; Vol. 25, No. 6. pp. 1579-1608.
@article{f6fe5a179add4f01b67ad5fd49b71c54,
title = "Justification and Interlaced Knowledge at ATLAS, CERN",
abstract = "We report on a longitudinal study of the emergence of the ATLAS detector, a complex technological system developed at CERN, Geneva. Our data show that the coordination of initial architectural choices was driven by cycles of contestation and justification that resulted in the creation of what we term interlaced knowledge-pockets of shared knowledge interwoven within and across subsystem communities at ATLAS. We also found that these justifications were possible because of the presence of a boundary infrastructure that served as a common substrate of knowledge for all ATLAS participants. Together, the boundary infrastructure and interlaced knowledge enabled participants to make co-oriented technological choices, address latent interdependencies, and minimize the incidence and severity of glitches when integrating the various subsystems.",
author = "P.R. Tuertscher and R. Garud and A. Kumaraswamy",
year = "2014",
doi = "10.1287/orsc.2013.0894",
language = "English",
volume = "25",
pages = "1579--1608",
journal = "Organization Science",
issn = "1047-7039",
publisher = "INFORMS Inst.for Operations Res.and the Management Sciences",
number = "6",

}

Justification and Interlaced Knowledge at ATLAS, CERN. / Tuertscher, P.R.; Garud, R.; Kumaraswamy, A.

In: Organization Science, Vol. 25, No. 6, 2014, p. 1579-1608.

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Justification and Interlaced Knowledge at ATLAS, CERN

AU - Tuertscher, P.R.

AU - Garud, R.

AU - Kumaraswamy, A.

PY - 2014

Y1 - 2014

N2 - We report on a longitudinal study of the emergence of the ATLAS detector, a complex technological system developed at CERN, Geneva. Our data show that the coordination of initial architectural choices was driven by cycles of contestation and justification that resulted in the creation of what we term interlaced knowledge-pockets of shared knowledge interwoven within and across subsystem communities at ATLAS. We also found that these justifications were possible because of the presence of a boundary infrastructure that served as a common substrate of knowledge for all ATLAS participants. Together, the boundary infrastructure and interlaced knowledge enabled participants to make co-oriented technological choices, address latent interdependencies, and minimize the incidence and severity of glitches when integrating the various subsystems.

AB - We report on a longitudinal study of the emergence of the ATLAS detector, a complex technological system developed at CERN, Geneva. Our data show that the coordination of initial architectural choices was driven by cycles of contestation and justification that resulted in the creation of what we term interlaced knowledge-pockets of shared knowledge interwoven within and across subsystem communities at ATLAS. We also found that these justifications were possible because of the presence of a boundary infrastructure that served as a common substrate of knowledge for all ATLAS participants. Together, the boundary infrastructure and interlaced knowledge enabled participants to make co-oriented technological choices, address latent interdependencies, and minimize the incidence and severity of glitches when integrating the various subsystems.

U2 - 10.1287/orsc.2013.0894

DO - 10.1287/orsc.2013.0894

M3 - Article

VL - 25

SP - 1579

EP - 1608

JO - Organization Science

JF - Organization Science

SN - 1047-7039

IS - 6

ER -