TY - JOUR
T1 - Knee varus-valgus motion during gait--a measure of joint stability in patients with osteoarthritis?
AU - van der Esch, M.
AU - Steultjens, M.P.M.
AU - Harlaar, J.
AU - Wolterbeek, N.
AU - Knol, D.L.
AU - Dekker, J.
PY - 2008
Y1 - 2008
N2 - Objective: To determine the validity of varus-valgus motion as a measure of knee joint stability by establishing the relationship of varus-valgus motion with muscle strength, joint proprioception, joint laxity and skeletal alignment in patients with knee osteoarthritis (OA). Methods: Sixty-three patients with OA of the knee were tested. Varus-valgus motion was determined with a video-based optoelectronic gait analysis system. Muscle strength was measured using a computer-driven isokinetic dynamometer. Proprioceptive acuity was assessed by establishing the joint motion detection threshold in the anterior-posterior direction. Laxity was assessed using a device which measures the passive angular deviation of the knee in the frontal plane. Alignment was assessed using a goniometer. Regression analyses were performed to assess the relationship between varus-valgus motion, muscle strength, joint proprioception, joint laxity and skeletal alignment. Result: Varus-valgus motion was not related to muscle strength, joint proprioception, joint laxity and skeletal alignment. Conclusions: Knee joint stability cannot be measured as varus-valgus motion. Rather, a number of independent factors seem to contribute to the process of stabilization of the knee joint. © 2007 Osteoarthritis Research Society International.
AB - Objective: To determine the validity of varus-valgus motion as a measure of knee joint stability by establishing the relationship of varus-valgus motion with muscle strength, joint proprioception, joint laxity and skeletal alignment in patients with knee osteoarthritis (OA). Methods: Sixty-three patients with OA of the knee were tested. Varus-valgus motion was determined with a video-based optoelectronic gait analysis system. Muscle strength was measured using a computer-driven isokinetic dynamometer. Proprioceptive acuity was assessed by establishing the joint motion detection threshold in the anterior-posterior direction. Laxity was assessed using a device which measures the passive angular deviation of the knee in the frontal plane. Alignment was assessed using a goniometer. Regression analyses were performed to assess the relationship between varus-valgus motion, muscle strength, joint proprioception, joint laxity and skeletal alignment. Result: Varus-valgus motion was not related to muscle strength, joint proprioception, joint laxity and skeletal alignment. Conclusions: Knee joint stability cannot be measured as varus-valgus motion. Rather, a number of independent factors seem to contribute to the process of stabilization of the knee joint. © 2007 Osteoarthritis Research Society International.
U2 - 10.1016/j.joca.2007.08.008
DO - 10.1016/j.joca.2007.08.008
M3 - Article
SN - 1063-4584
VL - 16
SP - 522
EP - 525
JO - Osteoarthritis and Cartilage
JF - Osteoarthritis and Cartilage
IS - 4
ER -