La lutte narrative pour la signification et la politisation de « l'Europe » dans les négociations du ttip: Le récit de l'Europe bouclier contre le populisme transnational

Translated title of the contribution: The narrative struggle for the signification of "Europe" in the context of the ttip negotiations: The European aegis narrative vs transnational populism

Alvaro Oleart, Luis Bouza Garciá

Research output: Contribution to JournalReview articleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

European Union studies are undergoing a narrative turn (Bouza Garcia, 2017). Academic debate is starting to consider both the importance of socio-cultural representations of Europeanness for understanding citizens' and civil society attitudes towards the EU and the usage of narrative strategies by EU political actors. In order to contribute to analysing how "Europe" is narrated in the current politicised environment, we analyse the competition to define and frame "Europe" in the context of the Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership (TTIP) project, focussing on the competing narrative strategies of the European Commission and the Stop TTIP coalition. We analyse the narratives put forward in strategic documents of both actors, conceiving the two opposing narratives as the opposition between "European Aegis" and "transnational populism". We will also present in-depth elite interviews with Brussels-based political actors to analyse the articulation of those narratives.

Translated title of the contributionThe narrative struggle for the signification of "Europe" in the context of the ttip negotiations: The European aegis narrative vs transnational populism
Original languageFrench
Pages (from-to)16-42
Number of pages27
JournalPolitique Europeenne
Volume2019
Issue number4, no 66
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2019

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The narrative struggle for the signification of "Europe" in the context of the ttip negotiations: The European aegis narrative vs transnational populism'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this