Abstract
A longstanding puzzle of empirical economics is that average labor productivity declines during recessions and increases during booms. This paper provides a framework to assess the empirical importance of competing hypotheses for explaining the observed procyclicality. For each competing hypothesis we derive the implications for cyclical productivity conditional on expectations of future demand and supply conditions. The novelty of the paper is that we exploit the tremendous heterogeneity in long-run structural changes across individual plants to identify the short-run sources of procyclical productivity.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Place of Publication | Amsterdam |
| Publisher | Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration |
| Publication status | Published - 1995 |
Publication series
| Name | Research Memorandum |
|---|---|
| No. | 1995-50 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 8 Decent Work and Economic Growth
Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver