Abstract
Background: While international guidelines for intrapartum care appear to have increased rapidly since 2000, literature suggests that it has only in few instances been matched with reviews of local modifications, use, and impact at the targeted low resource facilities. At a Tanzanian referral hospital, this paper describes the development process of locally achievable, partograph-associated, and peer-reviewed labour management guidelines, and it presents an assessment of professional birth attendants' perceptions. Methods: Part 1: Modification of evidence-based international guidelines through repeated evaluation cycles by local staff and seven external specialists in midwifery/obstetrics. Part 2: Questionnaire evaluation 12 months post-implementation of perceptions and use among professional birth attendants. Results: Part 1: After the development process, including three rounds of evaluation by staff and two external peer-review cycles, there were no major concerns with the guidelines internally nor externally. Thereby, international recommendations were condensed to the eight-paged 'PartoMa guidelines
Original language | English |
---|---|
Article number | 175 |
Pages (from-to) | 1-11 |
Number of pages | 11 |
Journal | BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth |
Volume | 17 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 7 Jun 2017 |
Funding
The PartoMa study is financed by grants from the Lundbeck, Laerdal and Augustinus foundations. The foundations have no role in the design, implementation, interpretation, and reporting.
Funders | Funder number |
---|---|
Lundbeck, Laerdal and Augustinus foundations |
Keywords
- Guidelines
- Labour
- Partograph
- PartoMa
- Quality of care
- Tanzania