Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Land remains a blind spot in tracking progress under the Paris Agreement due to lack of data comparability

  • Rosa M. Roman-Cuesta*
  • , Michel den Elzen
  • , Zuelclady Araujo-Gutierrez
  • , Nicklas Forsell
  • , William F. Lamb
  • , Emily McGlynn
  • , Joana Melo
  • , Simone Rossi
  • , Malte Meinshausen
  • , Sandro Federici
  • , Matthew Gidden
  • , Kimon Keramidas
  • , Anu Korosuo
  • , Giacomo Grassi
  • *Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Land carbon fluxes are key to the Paris Agreement. However, data comparability issues persist between countries’ land greenhouse gas inventories and mitigation targets, and what land models (bookkeeping and integrated assessments) provide as Paris-aligned benchmarks for land. As a result, the Global Stocktake, aiming to track collective mitigation progress, did not explicitly consider country targets for land. This blind spot leaves countries uninformed of the 2030 gap between their ambitions for mitigation on land and models’ benchmarks. Here we track the contribution and evolution of land-related targets under countries’ 2020 Nationally Determined Contributions, splitting land pledges between reduced emissions and additional sinks. Land retains a quarter of the global mitigation pledges in 2030, mostly relying on external support (−1.5ǂ1.1 GtCO2e/yr), of which −0.55 GtCO2e/yr are additional sinks. It is crucial that future Global Stocktakes include appropriate comparisons between modelled and country-provided land use net emissions. We here offer some concrete suggestions.

Original languageEnglish
Article number598
Pages (from-to)1-17
Number of pages17
JournalCommunications Earth & Environment
Volume6
Early online date28 Jul 2025
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2025

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© The European Union and the Authors 2025.

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Land remains a blind spot in tracking progress under the Paris Agreement due to lack of data comparability'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this