Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Language policy as interactional practice in everyday public space: The Corpus of Language Discrimination in Interaction

  • Chase Wesley Raymond*
  • , Saul Albert
  • , Elliott M. Hoey
  • , Sarah M. Adams
  • , Natalie Grothues
  • , Jacob Henry
  • , Olivia H. Marrese
  • , Megan Pielke
  • , Emily Reynolds
  • , Regina Gayou Tom
  • *Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to Journal › Article › Academic › peer-review

4 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

This article introduces the Corpus of Language Discrimination in Interaction (CLDI)—an open-access corpus of transcribed video data, capturing moments where individuals are policed in some way for the language they are speaking or otherwise endorsing while sharing public space (e.g. in stores, restaurants, parking lots, and parks). Despite having thus far largely evaded systematic inquiry, such interactions are illustrative of a particular genre of language policymaking and enforcement that takes place in everyday social life, which the CLDI aims to document and make available for ongoing empirical examination. After presenting the corpus itself, as an initial exploration into some of the practices and actions observable in these data, we describe the recurrent use of Speak English directives, accompanied by nation-state declarative accounts like This is America. Detailed analysis of such turns, and the responses they receive, throws into relief ways that language policies and ideologies can be instantiated, ratified, challenged, defended, and otherwise negotiated in and through the particulars of interactants’ joint conduct. We conclude by describing some future avenues for research, teaching, and public engagement on the basis of the CLDI.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)e1-e37
Number of pages37
JournalLanguage
Volume101
Issue number1
Early online date26 Mar 2025
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Mar 2025

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2025, Linguistic Society of America. All rights reserved.

Funding

* The authors are grateful to audiences at UCLA, the IDS-Mannheim, ICCA-23, and the EMCA4RJ Working Group for generous feedback on the arguments offered here, as well as on the CLDI more broadly. Our thanks also to Virginia Gill, John Heritage, and the editor, associate editors, and referees of Language for detailed comments on prior drafts of this manuscript, which was likewise advanced through conversations with Uwe-A. Küttner, Giovanni Rossi, Adam Schwartz, and Jörg Zinken. Any remaining infelicities are our own. We are furthermore indebted to Jane Archer, Michelle Brown, Blanca Cerda Herrera, Lauren Hall, Boniface Mwinyi, Felicity Slocombe, Andrew Ting, Aubrey Villanueva, Wan Wei, and Yuanyuan Zhang for additional support in various forms during the development of the CLDI. This research was supported in part by grants to Raymond from the University of Colorado, Boulder—from (i) the Department of Linguistics, (ii) the Center for Humanities & the Arts, and (iii) the College of Arts & Sciences STUDIO Lab. Publication of this article was funded by the University of Colorado, Boulder Libraries Open Access Fund.

Funders
University of Colorado Boulder
Center for Humanities & the Arts
College of Arts and Sciences, Drexel University

    Keywords

    • conversation analysis
    • discourse
    • ideologies
    • language policy
    • openaccess data
    • social interaction

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Language policy as interactional practice in everyday public space: The Corpus of Language Discrimination in Interaction'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this