Lateral interception II: Predicting hand movements

C.F. Michaels, D.M. Jacobs, R.M. Bongers

    Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

    183 Downloads (Pure)

    Abstract

    D. M. Jacobs and C. F. Michaels (2006) concluded that aspects of hand movements in lateral catching were predicted by the ratio of lateral optical velocity to expansion velocity. Their conclusions were based partly on a modified version of the required velocity model of catching (C. E. Peper, R. J. Bootsma, D. R. Mestre, & F. C. Bakker, 1994). The present article considers this optical ratio in detail and asks whether it, together with a control law, predicts the (often curious) hand trajectories observed in lateral interception. The optical ratio was used to create a succession of target-position inputs for the vector integration to endpoint model of hand movements (D. Bullock & S. Grossberg, 1988). The model used this succession, initial hand position, and model parameters (fit to 60 trials) to predict hand trajectories on each trial. Predicted trajectories were then compared with observed hand trajectories. Hand movements were predicted accurately, especially in the binocular condition, and were superior to predictions based on lateral ball position, the input variable of the required velocity model. The authors concluded, as did C. E. Peper et al. (1994), that perceivers continuously couple movements to optics. Copyright 2006 by the American Psychological Association.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)459-72
    JournalJournal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance
    Volume32
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2006

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Lateral interception II: Predicting hand movements'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this