Law, time and inhumanity: Reflections on the imprescriptible

Research output: Chapter in Book / Report / Conference proceedingChapterAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

The crimes known as the core international crimes, such as crimes against humanity and genocide, are imprescriptible, i.e., no time bars apply for their prosecution. Ever since the atrocities of the Second World War, the notion of the imprescriptible has become synonymous with the law’s dealing with the most heinous criminal acts. Not only lawyers, also philosophers have reflected on the theme and related concepts such as forgiveness and revenge. In criminal law, imprescriptible crimes form an exception. Normally, alleged criminal behaviour is subject to a so-called statute of limitations. These are ‘statute(s) providing for a timeframe within which criminal proceedings must be instituted. Statutes of limitation provide for a non-exculpatory defense to a criminal defendant. Accordingly, even if the accused is allegedly culpable, a statute of limitations will bar prosecution if an action is not timely commenced. Statutes of limitation appear not only in criminal law, but in international, civil, administrative, or tax law as well.’ 2 These statutes tend to ‘limit two types of action: limitations to criminal actions and limitations to the enforcement of sentences.’ 3 In other words, the passage of time affects the question whether or not a crime can be prosecuted. Time thus co-determines whether something is a matter of law. As said, the absence of such a statute of limitations is in contradiction with the normal situation in criminal law, in which crimes are (basically) all subjected to a statute of limitations. The especially shocking nature of international crimes is usually regarded as the justification for this exception.

LanguageEnglish
Title of host publicationTemporal Boundaries of Law and Politics
Subtitle of host publicationTime Out of Joint
PublisherRoutledge Taylor & Francis Group
Pages53-70
Number of pages18
ISBN (Electronic)9781351103473
ISBN (Print)9781138693975
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 12 Mar 2018

Fingerprint

statute of limitations
offense
Law
criminal law
prosecution
statute
criminal proceedings
tax law
administrative law
criminality
retaliation
genocide
accused
time
Inhumanity
Statute
World War
lawyer
Crime

Cite this

Corrias, L. (2018). Law, time and inhumanity: Reflections on the imprescriptible. In Temporal Boundaries of Law and Politics: Time Out of Joint (pp. 53-70). Routledge Taylor & Francis Group. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781351103480
Corrias, Luigi. / Law, time and inhumanity : Reflections on the imprescriptible. Temporal Boundaries of Law and Politics: Time Out of Joint. Routledge Taylor & Francis Group, 2018. pp. 53-70
@inbook{73f77336ebbc44c39e1fbf72d7d70c37,
title = "Law, time and inhumanity: Reflections on the imprescriptible",
abstract = "The crimes known as the core international crimes, such as crimes against humanity and genocide, are imprescriptible, i.e., no time bars apply for their prosecution. Ever since the atrocities of the Second World War, the notion of the imprescriptible has become synonymous with the law’s dealing with the most heinous criminal acts. Not only lawyers, also philosophers have reflected on the theme and related concepts such as forgiveness and revenge. In criminal law, imprescriptible crimes form an exception. Normally, alleged criminal behaviour is subject to a so-called statute of limitations. These are ‘statute(s) providing for a timeframe within which criminal proceedings must be instituted. Statutes of limitation provide for a non-exculpatory defense to a criminal defendant. Accordingly, even if the accused is allegedly culpable, a statute of limitations will bar prosecution if an action is not timely commenced. Statutes of limitation appear not only in criminal law, but in international, civil, administrative, or tax law as well.’ 2 These statutes tend to ‘limit two types of action: limitations to criminal actions and limitations to the enforcement of sentences.’ 3 In other words, the passage of time affects the question whether or not a crime can be prosecuted. Time thus co-determines whether something is a matter of law. As said, the absence of such a statute of limitations is in contradiction with the normal situation in criminal law, in which crimes are (basically) all subjected to a statute of limitations. The especially shocking nature of international crimes is usually regarded as the justification for this exception.",
author = "Luigi Corrias",
year = "2018",
month = "3",
day = "12",
doi = "10.4324/9781351103480",
language = "English",
isbn = "9781138693975",
pages = "53--70",
booktitle = "Temporal Boundaries of Law and Politics",
publisher = "Routledge Taylor & Francis Group",

}

Corrias, L 2018, Law, time and inhumanity: Reflections on the imprescriptible. in Temporal Boundaries of Law and Politics: Time Out of Joint. Routledge Taylor & Francis Group, pp. 53-70. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781351103480

Law, time and inhumanity : Reflections on the imprescriptible. / Corrias, Luigi.

Temporal Boundaries of Law and Politics: Time Out of Joint. Routledge Taylor & Francis Group, 2018. p. 53-70.

Research output: Chapter in Book / Report / Conference proceedingChapterAcademicpeer-review

TY - CHAP

T1 - Law, time and inhumanity

T2 - Reflections on the imprescriptible

AU - Corrias, Luigi

PY - 2018/3/12

Y1 - 2018/3/12

N2 - The crimes known as the core international crimes, such as crimes against humanity and genocide, are imprescriptible, i.e., no time bars apply for their prosecution. Ever since the atrocities of the Second World War, the notion of the imprescriptible has become synonymous with the law’s dealing with the most heinous criminal acts. Not only lawyers, also philosophers have reflected on the theme and related concepts such as forgiveness and revenge. In criminal law, imprescriptible crimes form an exception. Normally, alleged criminal behaviour is subject to a so-called statute of limitations. These are ‘statute(s) providing for a timeframe within which criminal proceedings must be instituted. Statutes of limitation provide for a non-exculpatory defense to a criminal defendant. Accordingly, even if the accused is allegedly culpable, a statute of limitations will bar prosecution if an action is not timely commenced. Statutes of limitation appear not only in criminal law, but in international, civil, administrative, or tax law as well.’ 2 These statutes tend to ‘limit two types of action: limitations to criminal actions and limitations to the enforcement of sentences.’ 3 In other words, the passage of time affects the question whether or not a crime can be prosecuted. Time thus co-determines whether something is a matter of law. As said, the absence of such a statute of limitations is in contradiction with the normal situation in criminal law, in which crimes are (basically) all subjected to a statute of limitations. The especially shocking nature of international crimes is usually regarded as the justification for this exception.

AB - The crimes known as the core international crimes, such as crimes against humanity and genocide, are imprescriptible, i.e., no time bars apply for their prosecution. Ever since the atrocities of the Second World War, the notion of the imprescriptible has become synonymous with the law’s dealing with the most heinous criminal acts. Not only lawyers, also philosophers have reflected on the theme and related concepts such as forgiveness and revenge. In criminal law, imprescriptible crimes form an exception. Normally, alleged criminal behaviour is subject to a so-called statute of limitations. These are ‘statute(s) providing for a timeframe within which criminal proceedings must be instituted. Statutes of limitation provide for a non-exculpatory defense to a criminal defendant. Accordingly, even if the accused is allegedly culpable, a statute of limitations will bar prosecution if an action is not timely commenced. Statutes of limitation appear not only in criminal law, but in international, civil, administrative, or tax law as well.’ 2 These statutes tend to ‘limit two types of action: limitations to criminal actions and limitations to the enforcement of sentences.’ 3 In other words, the passage of time affects the question whether or not a crime can be prosecuted. Time thus co-determines whether something is a matter of law. As said, the absence of such a statute of limitations is in contradiction with the normal situation in criminal law, in which crimes are (basically) all subjected to a statute of limitations. The especially shocking nature of international crimes is usually regarded as the justification for this exception.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85048697136&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85048697136&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.4324/9781351103480

DO - 10.4324/9781351103480

M3 - Chapter

SN - 9781138693975

SP - 53

EP - 70

BT - Temporal Boundaries of Law and Politics

PB - Routledge Taylor & Francis Group

ER -

Corrias L. Law, time and inhumanity: Reflections on the imprescriptible. In Temporal Boundaries of Law and Politics: Time Out of Joint. Routledge Taylor & Francis Group. 2018. p. 53-70 https://doi.org/10.4324/9781351103480