Legal Logic? Or can we do without?

A. Soeteman

doi:10.1023/b:arti.0000046009.10530.fd

Legal Logic? Or can we do without?

A. Soeteman

Research output: Contribution to Journal › Article › Academic › peer-review

Abstract

In this paper the thesis is argued that there is no need for a special legal logic to deal with the defeasibility of legal arguments. An important argument for this thesis is that legal judgements ask for a complete justification and that such a complete justification requires a deductively valid argument. © 2004 Kluwer Academic Publishers.

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	197-210
Number of pages	14
Journal	Artificial Intelligence and Law
Volume	11
Issue number	2003
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1023/b:arti.0000046009.10530.fd
Publication status	Published - 2004

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

Access to Document

10.1023/b:arti.0000046009.10530.fd

Handle.net

Persistent link

Cite this

@article{ed1ebd8d61b4413f8ffee37dd85c0350,

title = "Legal Logic? Or can we do without?",

abstract = "In this paper the thesis is argued that there is no need for a special legal logic to deal with the defeasibility of legal arguments. An important argument for this thesis is that legal judgements ask for a complete justification and that such a complete justification requires a deductively valid argument. {\textcopyright} 2004 Kluwer Academic Publishers.",

author = "A. Soeteman",

year = "2004",

doi = "10.1023/b:arti.0000046009.10530.fd",

language = "English",

volume = "11",

pages = "197--210",

journal = "Artificial Intelligence and Law",

issn = "0924-8463",