Abstract
In this paper the thesis is argued that there is no need for a special legal logic to deal with the defeasibility of legal arguments. An important argument for this thesis is that legal judgements ask for a complete justification and that such a complete justification requires a deductively valid argument. © 2004 Kluwer Academic Publishers.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 197-210 |
| Number of pages | 14 |
| Journal | Artificial Intelligence and Law |
| Volume | 11 |
| Issue number | 2003 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 2004 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 16 Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Legal Logic? Or can we do without?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver