Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

License to fail..?!! Leader prototypicality, leader performance, and leadership endorsement

    Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

    Abstract

    Leadership often serves as an explanatory category for performance outcomes (i.e., failure and success). This process can strengthen or weaken leadership effectiveness, because contingent on their performance leaders may gain or lose follower endorsement - the basis of leadership. Drawing on the social identity analysis of leadership, we hypothesized that leader group prototypicality and performance information interact to predict followers' perceptions of leadership effectiveness. Because group prototypical leaders are more trusted by their followers, we hypothesized that group prototypical leaders are evaluated as more effective after failure information than non-prototypical leaders. In contrast, we predicted that both prototypical and non-prototypical leaders should receive similar evaluations of leadership effectiveness after success. We found support for our predictions in a scenario experiment, a cross-sectional field study, and a laboratory experiment. © 2009 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)434-451
    Number of pages18
    JournalThe Leadership Quarterly
    Volume20
    Issue number3
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2009

    UN SDGs

    This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

    1. SDG 16 - Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions
      SDG 16 Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'License to fail..?!! Leader prototypicality, leader performance, and leadership endorsement'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this