Abstract
This paper provides evidence consistent with elite capture of Social Fund investment projects in Ecuador. Exploiting a unique combination of data sets on village-level income distributions, Social Fund project administration, and province-level electoral results, we test a simple model of project choice when local political power is unequally distributed. In accordance with the predictions of the model, poorer villages are more likely to receive projects that provide excludable (private) goods to the poor, such as latrines. Controlling for poverty, more unequal communities are less likely to receive such projects. Consistent with the hypothesis of elite capture, these results are sensitive to the specific measures of inequality and elite power used in the empirical analysis, and are strongest for expenditure shares at the top of the distribution.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 1022-1046 |
| Number of pages | 25 |
| Journal | Journal of Public Economics |
| Volume | 92 |
| Issue number | 5-6 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - Jun 2008 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 1 No Poverty
-
SDG 10 Reduced Inequalities
Keywords
- D72
- Elite capture
- H42
- Inequality
- O15
- Poverty
- Social funds
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Local inequality and project choice: Theory and evidence from Ecuador'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver