Logical Constraints on Judgement Aggregation

Marc Pauly, Martin Van Hees

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Abstract  Logical puzzles like the doctrinal paradox raise the problem of how to aggregate individual judgements into a collective judgement, or alternatively, how to merge collectively inconsistent knowledge bases. In this paper, we view judgement aggregation as a function on propositional logic valuations, and we investigate how logic constrains judgement aggregation. In particular, we show that there is no non-dictatorial decision method for aggregating sets of judgements in a logically consistent way if the decision method is local, i.e., only depends on the individual judgements on the proposition under consideration.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)569-585
Number of pages17
JournalJournal of Philosophical Logic
Volume35
Issue number6
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Dec 2006

Fingerprint

Logic
Propositional Logic
Paradox

Cite this

@article{4fba7ccf639e424cb4b93800f4f86714,
title = "Logical Constraints on Judgement Aggregation",
abstract = "Abstract  Logical puzzles like the doctrinal paradox raise the problem of how to aggregate individual judgements into a collective judgement, or alternatively, how to merge collectively inconsistent knowledge bases. In this paper, we view judgement aggregation as a function on propositional logic valuations, and we investigate how logic constrains judgement aggregation. In particular, we show that there is no non-dictatorial decision method for aggregating sets of judgements in a logically consistent way if the decision method is local, i.e., only depends on the individual judgements on the proposition under consideration.",
author = "Marc Pauly and {Van Hees}, Martin",
year = "2006",
month = "12",
doi = "10.1007/s10992-005-9011-x",
language = "English",
volume = "35",
pages = "569--585",
journal = "Journal of Philosophical Logic",
issn = "0022-3611",
publisher = "Springer Netherlands",
number = "6",

}

Logical Constraints on Judgement Aggregation. / Pauly, Marc; Van Hees, Martin.

In: Journal of Philosophical Logic, Vol. 35, No. 6, 12.2006, p. 569-585.

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Logical Constraints on Judgement Aggregation

AU - Pauly, Marc

AU - Van Hees, Martin

PY - 2006/12

Y1 - 2006/12

N2 - Abstract  Logical puzzles like the doctrinal paradox raise the problem of how to aggregate individual judgements into a collective judgement, or alternatively, how to merge collectively inconsistent knowledge bases. In this paper, we view judgement aggregation as a function on propositional logic valuations, and we investigate how logic constrains judgement aggregation. In particular, we show that there is no non-dictatorial decision method for aggregating sets of judgements in a logically consistent way if the decision method is local, i.e., only depends on the individual judgements on the proposition under consideration.

AB - Abstract  Logical puzzles like the doctrinal paradox raise the problem of how to aggregate individual judgements into a collective judgement, or alternatively, how to merge collectively inconsistent knowledge bases. In this paper, we view judgement aggregation as a function on propositional logic valuations, and we investigate how logic constrains judgement aggregation. In particular, we show that there is no non-dictatorial decision method for aggregating sets of judgements in a logically consistent way if the decision method is local, i.e., only depends on the individual judgements on the proposition under consideration.

U2 - 10.1007/s10992-005-9011-x

DO - 10.1007/s10992-005-9011-x

M3 - Article

VL - 35

SP - 569

EP - 585

JO - Journal of Philosophical Logic

JF - Journal of Philosophical Logic

SN - 0022-3611

IS - 6

ER -