TY - JOUR
T1 - Long-Interval T2-Weighted Subtraction Magnetic Resonance Imaging A Powerful New Outcome Measure in Multiple Sclerosis Trials
AU - Moraal, B.
AU - van den Elskamp, I.J.
AU - Knol, D.L.
AU - Uitdehaag, B.M.J.
AU - Geurts, J.J.G.
AU - Vrenken, H.
AU - Pouwels, P.J.W.
AU - van Schijndel, R.A.
AU - Meier, D.S.
AU - Guttmann, C.R.G.
AU - Barkhof, F.
PY - 2010
Y1 - 2010
N2 - Objective: To compare long-interval T2-weighted subtraction (T2w-Sub) imaging with monthly gadolinium-enhanced. T1-weighted (Gd-T1w) imaging for (1) detection of active lesions, (2) assessment of treatment efficacy, and (3) statistical power, in a multiple sclerosis (MS), phase 2, clinical trial setting. Methods: Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) data over 9 months from 120 patients (61 treatment, 59 placebo) from the oral temsirolimus trial were used. T2w-Sub images were scored for active lesions, independent of the original reading of the monthly Gd-T1w images. Treatment efficacy was evaluated using the nonparametric Mann-Whitney U test, and parametric negative binomial (NB)-regression and power calculations were conducted. Results: Datasets from 116 patients (58 treatment, 58 placebo) were evaluated. The mean number of T2w-Sub lesions in the treatment group was 3.0 (±4.6) versus 5.9 (±8.8) for placebo; the mean cumulative number of new Gd-T1w lesions in the treatment group was 5.5(±9.1) versus 9.1(±17.2) for placebo. T2w-Sub imaging showed increased power to assess treatment efficacy compared with Gd-T1w imaging, when evaluated by Mann-Whitney U test (p = 0.017 vs p = 0.177), or NB-regression without (p = 0.011 vs p = 0.092) or with baseline adjustment (p < 0.001 vs p = 0.002). Depending on the magnitude of the simulated treatment effect, sample size calculations showed reductions of 22 to 34% in the number of patients (translating into reductions of 81-83% in the number of MRI scans) needed to detect a significant treatment effect in favor of T2w-Sub imaging. Interpretation: Compared with monthly Gd-T1w imaging, long-interval T2w-Sub MRI exhibited increased power to assess treatment efficacy, and could greatly increase the cost-effectiveness of phase 2 MS trials by limiting the number of patients, contrast injections, and MRI scans needed. © 2010 American Neurological Association.
AB - Objective: To compare long-interval T2-weighted subtraction (T2w-Sub) imaging with monthly gadolinium-enhanced. T1-weighted (Gd-T1w) imaging for (1) detection of active lesions, (2) assessment of treatment efficacy, and (3) statistical power, in a multiple sclerosis (MS), phase 2, clinical trial setting. Methods: Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) data over 9 months from 120 patients (61 treatment, 59 placebo) from the oral temsirolimus trial were used. T2w-Sub images were scored for active lesions, independent of the original reading of the monthly Gd-T1w images. Treatment efficacy was evaluated using the nonparametric Mann-Whitney U test, and parametric negative binomial (NB)-regression and power calculations were conducted. Results: Datasets from 116 patients (58 treatment, 58 placebo) were evaluated. The mean number of T2w-Sub lesions in the treatment group was 3.0 (±4.6) versus 5.9 (±8.8) for placebo; the mean cumulative number of new Gd-T1w lesions in the treatment group was 5.5(±9.1) versus 9.1(±17.2) for placebo. T2w-Sub imaging showed increased power to assess treatment efficacy compared with Gd-T1w imaging, when evaluated by Mann-Whitney U test (p = 0.017 vs p = 0.177), or NB-regression without (p = 0.011 vs p = 0.092) or with baseline adjustment (p < 0.001 vs p = 0.002). Depending on the magnitude of the simulated treatment effect, sample size calculations showed reductions of 22 to 34% in the number of patients (translating into reductions of 81-83% in the number of MRI scans) needed to detect a significant treatment effect in favor of T2w-Sub imaging. Interpretation: Compared with monthly Gd-T1w imaging, long-interval T2w-Sub MRI exhibited increased power to assess treatment efficacy, and could greatly increase the cost-effectiveness of phase 2 MS trials by limiting the number of patients, contrast injections, and MRI scans needed. © 2010 American Neurological Association.
U2 - 10.1002/ana.21958
DO - 10.1002/ana.21958
M3 - Article
SN - 0364-5134
VL - 67
SP - 667
EP - 675
JO - Annals of Neurology
JF - Annals of Neurology
IS - 5
ER -