TY - JOUR
T1 - Long-term follow-up of turned single implants placed in periodontally healthy patients after 16-22 years
T2 - Radiographic and peri-implant outcome
AU - Dierens, M.
AU - Vandeweghe, S.
AU - Kisch, J.
AU - Nilner, K.
AU - de Bruyn, H.
PY - 2012/2
Y1 - 2012/2
N2 - Objectives: Retrospectively evaluate the survival, radiographic and peri-implant outcome of single turned Brånemark ™ implants after at least 16 years. Materials and methods: From 134 patients (C-group), 101 could be contacted concerning implant survival and 50 (59 remaining implants) were clinically examined (I-group). Marginal bone level was radiographically measured from the implant-abutment junction at baseline (=within 6 months after abutment connection) and 1-4, 5-8 and 16-22 years post-operatively. Probing depth, gingival and plaque index were measured. Marginal bone-level changes were analyzed using Friedman's and Wilcoxon's signed ranks tests. Spearman's correlations between radiographic and clinical parameters were calculated. Results: In the C-group, 13 out of 166 implants in 11 out of 134 patients failed (CSR=91.5%). In the I-group (28 males-22 females; mean age 23.9 years at baseline; range 14-57), the mean follow-up was 18.4 years (range 16-22). The mean bone level was 1.7±0.88mm (range -0.8 to 5) after 16-22 years. Changes in the mean marginal bone level were statistically significant between baseline and the second measuring interval (1-4 years). Thereafter, no significant differences could be demonstrated. The mean interproximal probing depth, gingival and plaque indices were 3.9±1.27mm, 1.2±0.81 and 0.2±0.48, respectively. Probing depth was moderately correlated with gingival inflammation (r=0.6; P<0.001) but not with bone level (P>0.05). 81.4% of the implants had a bone level ≤2nd thread and 91.5% had a probing depth ≤5mm. 76.3% had both bone level ≤2nd thread and probing depth ≤5mm. Conclusions and clinical implications: The single turned Brånemark ™ implant is a predictable solution with high clinical survival and success rates. In general, a steady-state bone level can be expected over decades, with minimal signs of peri-implant disease. A minority (5%), however, presents with progressive bone loss. © 2011 John Wiley & Sons A/S.
AB - Objectives: Retrospectively evaluate the survival, radiographic and peri-implant outcome of single turned Brånemark ™ implants after at least 16 years. Materials and methods: From 134 patients (C-group), 101 could be contacted concerning implant survival and 50 (59 remaining implants) were clinically examined (I-group). Marginal bone level was radiographically measured from the implant-abutment junction at baseline (=within 6 months after abutment connection) and 1-4, 5-8 and 16-22 years post-operatively. Probing depth, gingival and plaque index were measured. Marginal bone-level changes were analyzed using Friedman's and Wilcoxon's signed ranks tests. Spearman's correlations between radiographic and clinical parameters were calculated. Results: In the C-group, 13 out of 166 implants in 11 out of 134 patients failed (CSR=91.5%). In the I-group (28 males-22 females; mean age 23.9 years at baseline; range 14-57), the mean follow-up was 18.4 years (range 16-22). The mean bone level was 1.7±0.88mm (range -0.8 to 5) after 16-22 years. Changes in the mean marginal bone level were statistically significant between baseline and the second measuring interval (1-4 years). Thereafter, no significant differences could be demonstrated. The mean interproximal probing depth, gingival and plaque indices were 3.9±1.27mm, 1.2±0.81 and 0.2±0.48, respectively. Probing depth was moderately correlated with gingival inflammation (r=0.6; P<0.001) but not with bone level (P>0.05). 81.4% of the implants had a bone level ≤2nd thread and 91.5% had a probing depth ≤5mm. 76.3% had both bone level ≤2nd thread and probing depth ≤5mm. Conclusions and clinical implications: The single turned Brånemark ™ implant is a predictable solution with high clinical survival and success rates. In general, a steady-state bone level can be expected over decades, with minimal signs of peri-implant disease. A minority (5%), however, presents with progressive bone loss. © 2011 John Wiley & Sons A/S.
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/84855948676
UR - https://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84855948676&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2011.02212.x
DO - 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2011.02212.x
M3 - Article
SN - 0905-7161
VL - 23
SP - 197
EP - 204
JO - Clinical Oral Implants Research
JF - Clinical Oral Implants Research
IS - 2
ER -