Longinus, on the Sublime 12.4-5: Demosthenes and Cicero

Casper C. De Jonge, Arjan A. Nijk

Research output: Contribution to JournalReview articleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

This article discusses the critical comparison (σγκρισισ) of the styles of Demosthenes and Cicero in Longinus, On the Sublime 12.4-5. Many readers have claimed that Longinus here presents Demosthenes and Cicero as two different models of the sublime. A detailed analysis of the passage, however, reveals that while the two are both credited with grandeur (μγϵθωσ), they are in fact not treated on a par with respect to sublimity (ψωσ). While the style of Demosthenes is described with keywords of Longinus' conception of the sublime (ψωσ), Cicero's style is consistently associated with the quality of diffusion (χσισ), which is closely associated with amplification (αξησισ). Longinus' discussion of Cicero may have pleased the Roman readers in his audience, as he is presented as a canonical author of 'great' literature. We argue, however, that in the end, Longinus reserves the status of sublimity for his heroes of classical Greece.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1-25
Number of pages25
JournalMnemosyne
DOIs
Publication statusAccepted/In press - Jul 2018

Fingerprint

Greece
literature
Cicero
Demosthenes
Sublimity
Reader

Keywords

  • Cicero
  • Demosthenes
  • Greek and Roman literary criticism
  • the sublime

Cite this

De Jonge, Casper C. ; Nijk, Arjan A. / Longinus, on the Sublime 12.4-5 : Demosthenes and Cicero. In: Mnemosyne. 2018 ; pp. 1-25.
@article{ee82b17c8f52409ba32000e4f29ef724,
title = "Longinus, on the Sublime 12.4-5: Demosthenes and Cicero",
abstract = "This article discusses the critical comparison (σγκρισισ) of the styles of Demosthenes and Cicero in Longinus, On the Sublime 12.4-5. Many readers have claimed that Longinus here presents Demosthenes and Cicero as two different models of the sublime. A detailed analysis of the passage, however, reveals that while the two are both credited with grandeur (μγϵθωσ), they are in fact not treated on a par with respect to sublimity (ψωσ). While the style of Demosthenes is described with keywords of Longinus' conception of the sublime (ψωσ), Cicero's style is consistently associated with the quality of diffusion (χσισ), which is closely associated with amplification (αξησισ). Longinus' discussion of Cicero may have pleased the Roman readers in his audience, as he is presented as a canonical author of 'great' literature. We argue, however, that in the end, Longinus reserves the status of sublimity for his heroes of classical Greece.",
keywords = "Cicero, Demosthenes, Greek and Roman literary criticism, the sublime",
author = "{De Jonge}, {Casper C.} and Nijk, {Arjan A.}",
year = "2018",
month = "7",
doi = "10.1163/1568525X-12342532",
language = "English",
pages = "1--25",
journal = "Mnemosyne: A Journal of Classical Studies",
issn = "0026-7074",
publisher = "Brill",

}

Longinus, on the Sublime 12.4-5 : Demosthenes and Cicero. / De Jonge, Casper C.; Nijk, Arjan A.

In: Mnemosyne, 07.2018, p. 1-25.

Research output: Contribution to JournalReview articleAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Longinus, on the Sublime 12.4-5

T2 - Demosthenes and Cicero

AU - De Jonge, Casper C.

AU - Nijk, Arjan A.

PY - 2018/7

Y1 - 2018/7

N2 - This article discusses the critical comparison (σγκρισισ) of the styles of Demosthenes and Cicero in Longinus, On the Sublime 12.4-5. Many readers have claimed that Longinus here presents Demosthenes and Cicero as two different models of the sublime. A detailed analysis of the passage, however, reveals that while the two are both credited with grandeur (μγϵθωσ), they are in fact not treated on a par with respect to sublimity (ψωσ). While the style of Demosthenes is described with keywords of Longinus' conception of the sublime (ψωσ), Cicero's style is consistently associated with the quality of diffusion (χσισ), which is closely associated with amplification (αξησισ). Longinus' discussion of Cicero may have pleased the Roman readers in his audience, as he is presented as a canonical author of 'great' literature. We argue, however, that in the end, Longinus reserves the status of sublimity for his heroes of classical Greece.

AB - This article discusses the critical comparison (σγκρισισ) of the styles of Demosthenes and Cicero in Longinus, On the Sublime 12.4-5. Many readers have claimed that Longinus here presents Demosthenes and Cicero as two different models of the sublime. A detailed analysis of the passage, however, reveals that while the two are both credited with grandeur (μγϵθωσ), they are in fact not treated on a par with respect to sublimity (ψωσ). While the style of Demosthenes is described with keywords of Longinus' conception of the sublime (ψωσ), Cicero's style is consistently associated with the quality of diffusion (χσισ), which is closely associated with amplification (αξησισ). Longinus' discussion of Cicero may have pleased the Roman readers in his audience, as he is presented as a canonical author of 'great' literature. We argue, however, that in the end, Longinus reserves the status of sublimity for his heroes of classical Greece.

KW - Cicero

KW - Demosthenes

KW - Greek and Roman literary criticism

KW - the sublime

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85061015575&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85061015575&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1163/1568525X-12342532

DO - 10.1163/1568525X-12342532

M3 - Review article

SP - 1

EP - 25

JO - Mnemosyne: A Journal of Classical Studies

JF - Mnemosyne: A Journal of Classical Studies

SN - 0026-7074

ER -