Abstract
This article discusses the critical comparison (σγκρισισ) of the styles of Demosthenes and Cicero in Longinus, On the Sublime 12.4-5. Many readers have claimed that Longinus here presents Demosthenes and Cicero as two different models of the sublime. A detailed analysis of the passage, however, reveals that while the two are both credited with grandeur (μγϵθωσ), they are in fact not treated on a par with respect to sublimity (ψωσ). While the style of Demosthenes is described with keywords of Longinus' conception of the sublime (ψωσ), Cicero's style is consistently associated with the quality of diffusion (χσισ), which is closely associated with amplification (αξησισ). Longinus' discussion of Cicero may have pleased the Roman readers in his audience, as he is presented as a canonical author of 'great' literature. We argue, however, that in the end, Longinus reserves the status of sublimity for his heroes of classical Greece.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 1-25 |
| Number of pages | 25 |
| Journal | Mnemosyne |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Accepted/In press - Jul 2018 |
Fingerprint
Keywords
- Cicero
- Demosthenes
- Greek and Roman literary criticism
- the sublime
Cite this
}
Longinus, on the Sublime 12.4-5 : Demosthenes and Cicero. / De Jonge, Casper C.; Nijk, Arjan A.
In: Mnemosyne, 07.2018, p. 1-25.Research output: Contribution to Journal › Review article › Academic › peer-review
TY - JOUR
T1 - Longinus, on the Sublime 12.4-5
T2 - Demosthenes and Cicero
AU - De Jonge, Casper C.
AU - Nijk, Arjan A.
PY - 2018/7
Y1 - 2018/7
N2 - This article discusses the critical comparison (σγκρισισ) of the styles of Demosthenes and Cicero in Longinus, On the Sublime 12.4-5. Many readers have claimed that Longinus here presents Demosthenes and Cicero as two different models of the sublime. A detailed analysis of the passage, however, reveals that while the two are both credited with grandeur (μγϵθωσ), they are in fact not treated on a par with respect to sublimity (ψωσ). While the style of Demosthenes is described with keywords of Longinus' conception of the sublime (ψωσ), Cicero's style is consistently associated with the quality of diffusion (χσισ), which is closely associated with amplification (αξησισ). Longinus' discussion of Cicero may have pleased the Roman readers in his audience, as he is presented as a canonical author of 'great' literature. We argue, however, that in the end, Longinus reserves the status of sublimity for his heroes of classical Greece.
AB - This article discusses the critical comparison (σγκρισισ) of the styles of Demosthenes and Cicero in Longinus, On the Sublime 12.4-5. Many readers have claimed that Longinus here presents Demosthenes and Cicero as two different models of the sublime. A detailed analysis of the passage, however, reveals that while the two are both credited with grandeur (μγϵθωσ), they are in fact not treated on a par with respect to sublimity (ψωσ). While the style of Demosthenes is described with keywords of Longinus' conception of the sublime (ψωσ), Cicero's style is consistently associated with the quality of diffusion (χσισ), which is closely associated with amplification (αξησισ). Longinus' discussion of Cicero may have pleased the Roman readers in his audience, as he is presented as a canonical author of 'great' literature. We argue, however, that in the end, Longinus reserves the status of sublimity for his heroes of classical Greece.
KW - Cicero
KW - Demosthenes
KW - Greek and Roman literary criticism
KW - the sublime
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85061015575&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85061015575&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1163/1568525X-12342532
DO - 10.1163/1568525X-12342532
M3 - Review article
SP - 1
EP - 25
JO - Mnemosyne: A Journal of Classical Studies
JF - Mnemosyne: A Journal of Classical Studies
SN - 0026-7074
ER -