Abstract
In ambiguous settings, people are tempted to make self-serving mistakes. Here, we assess whether people make more self-serving mistakes to minimize losses compared with maximize gains. Results reveal that participants are twice as likely to make self-serving mistakes to reduce losses compared to increase gains. We further trace participants' eye movements to gain insight into the process underlying self-serving mistakes in losses and gains. We find that tempting, self-serving information does not capture more attention in loss, compared to gain framing. Rather, in loss framing, people are more likely to report the tempting, self-serving information they observed. The results imply that rather than diverting attention away from tempting information, reducing people's motivation to make self-serving mistakes, and framing goals as gains rather than losses are promising ways to decrease the occurrence of self-serving mistakes. In turn, this fosters environments with more accuracy and fewer motivated mistakes.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Article number | 103880 |
| Pages (from-to) | 1-11 |
| Number of pages | 11 |
| Journal | Journal of Experimental Social Psychology |
| Volume | 85 |
| Early online date | 12 Aug 2019 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - Nov 2019 |
Funding
The research was funded by European Research Council (ERC-StG-637915) and the Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research (VENI grant 451-15-030).☆ The research was funded by European Research Council (ERC-StG-637915) and the Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research (VENI grant 451-15-030).
| Funders | Funder number |
|---|---|
| Horizon 2020 Framework Programme | 637915 |
| European Research Council | 451-15-030 |
Keywords
- Attention
- Ambiguous dice paradigm
- Ethical decision making
- Framing
- Eye-tracking
- Motivated mistakes