Abstract
Background: Practice effects (PEs) are improvements in performance after repeated exposure to test materials, and typically viewed as a source of bias in repeated cognitive assessments. We aimed to determine whether characterizing PEs could also provide a useful marker of early cognitive decline. Methods: We conducted a systematic review of the literature, searching PsycInfo (Ebsco) and PubMed databases for articles studying PEs in aging and dementia populations. Articles published between 1920 and 2019 were included. Result: We identified 259 articles, of which 27 studied PEs as markers of cognitive performance. These studies consistently showed that smaller, less-robust PEs were associated with current diagnostic status and/or future cognitive decline. In addition, lower PEs were associated with Alzheimer's disease risk factors and neurodegeneration biomarkers. Conclusion: PEs provide a potentially useful marker of cognitive decline, and could prove valuable as part of a cost-effective strategy to select individuals who are at-risk for dementia for future interventions.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Article number | e12055 |
Pages (from-to) | 1-12 |
Number of pages | 12 |
Journal | Alzheimer's and Dementia: Diagnosis, Assessment and Disease Monitoring |
Volume | 12 |
Early online date | 9 Jul 2020 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 2020 |
Funding
This work was supported by National Institutes of Health (NIH) grant R01AG029672 (Paul K. Crane, PI) and by funding from NIH‐National Institute of General Medicine SC3.GM122662 (Nancy S. Foldi, PI).
Funders | Funder number |
---|---|
NIH-National Institute of General Medicine SC3.GM122662 | |
NIH‐National Institute of General Medicine SC3.GM122662 | |
National Institutes of Health | R01AG029672 |
Keywords
- Alzheimer's disease
- cognition
- learning effects
- practice effects
- retest effects