Making initiatives resonate: how can non-state initiatives advance national contributions under the UNFCCC?

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

The international governance landscape on climate change mitigation is increasingly complex across multiple governance levels. Climate change mitigation initiatives by non-state stakeholders can play an important role in governing global climate change. The article addresses the relationship between intergovernmental and transnational governance processes in global climate governance. Particularly, the article aims to complement existing research on the role of “orchestration” by and through the UNFCCC process by focusing on how successful transnational initiatives can resonate within the intergovernmental negotiation process in order to inspire more ambitious climate action also on the part of national governments. This issue is addressed by systematically analysing interdependencies between transnational and international governance. Building on a structurational regime model, the article develops a theory of change of how and through which structuration channels non-state initiatives can contribute to changing the politics of international climate policy, traces existing UNFCCC processes and the Paris Agreement with a view to identifying inroads for a more direct feedback from non-state initiatives and derives recommendations on how and under which agenda items positive experiences can resonate within the UNFCCC negotiation process.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)447-466
Number of pages20
JournalInternational Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics
Volume18
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 9 Apr 2018

Fingerprint

governance
climate change
climate
structuration
climate policy
stakeholder
Governance
regime
politics
experience
Climate
Negotiation process
Climate change mitigation

Keywords

  • Non-state and subnational actors
  • Orchestration
  • Paris Agreement
  • Regime complex
  • Transnational climate governance
  • UNFCCC

Cite this

@article{9ea4a224c01740cbb487ec8b0a8eb42a,
title = "Making initiatives resonate: how can non-state initiatives advance national contributions under the UNFCCC?",
abstract = "The international governance landscape on climate change mitigation is increasingly complex across multiple governance levels. Climate change mitigation initiatives by non-state stakeholders can play an important role in governing global climate change. The article addresses the relationship between intergovernmental and transnational governance processes in global climate governance. Particularly, the article aims to complement existing research on the role of “orchestration” by and through the UNFCCC process by focusing on how successful transnational initiatives can resonate within the intergovernmental negotiation process in order to inspire more ambitious climate action also on the part of national governments. This issue is addressed by systematically analysing interdependencies between transnational and international governance. Building on a structurational regime model, the article develops a theory of change of how and through which structuration channels non-state initiatives can contribute to changing the politics of international climate policy, traces existing UNFCCC processes and the Paris Agreement with a view to identifying inroads for a more direct feedback from non-state initiatives and derives recommendations on how and under which agenda items positive experiences can resonate within the UNFCCC negotiation process.",
keywords = "Non-state and subnational actors, Orchestration, Paris Agreement, Regime complex, Transnational climate governance, UNFCCC",
author = "Lukas Hermwille",
year = "2018",
month = "4",
day = "9",
doi = "10.1007/s10784-018-9398-9",
language = "English",
volume = "18",
pages = "447--466",
journal = "International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics",
issn = "1567-9764",
publisher = "Springer Verlag",
number = "3",

}

Making initiatives resonate: how can non-state initiatives advance national contributions under the UNFCCC? / Hermwille, Lukas.

In: International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, Vol. 18, No. 3, 09.04.2018, p. 447-466.

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Making initiatives resonate: how can non-state initiatives advance national contributions under the UNFCCC?

AU - Hermwille, Lukas

PY - 2018/4/9

Y1 - 2018/4/9

N2 - The international governance landscape on climate change mitigation is increasingly complex across multiple governance levels. Climate change mitigation initiatives by non-state stakeholders can play an important role in governing global climate change. The article addresses the relationship between intergovernmental and transnational governance processes in global climate governance. Particularly, the article aims to complement existing research on the role of “orchestration” by and through the UNFCCC process by focusing on how successful transnational initiatives can resonate within the intergovernmental negotiation process in order to inspire more ambitious climate action also on the part of national governments. This issue is addressed by systematically analysing interdependencies between transnational and international governance. Building on a structurational regime model, the article develops a theory of change of how and through which structuration channels non-state initiatives can contribute to changing the politics of international climate policy, traces existing UNFCCC processes and the Paris Agreement with a view to identifying inroads for a more direct feedback from non-state initiatives and derives recommendations on how and under which agenda items positive experiences can resonate within the UNFCCC negotiation process.

AB - The international governance landscape on climate change mitigation is increasingly complex across multiple governance levels. Climate change mitigation initiatives by non-state stakeholders can play an important role in governing global climate change. The article addresses the relationship between intergovernmental and transnational governance processes in global climate governance. Particularly, the article aims to complement existing research on the role of “orchestration” by and through the UNFCCC process by focusing on how successful transnational initiatives can resonate within the intergovernmental negotiation process in order to inspire more ambitious climate action also on the part of national governments. This issue is addressed by systematically analysing interdependencies between transnational and international governance. Building on a structurational regime model, the article develops a theory of change of how and through which structuration channels non-state initiatives can contribute to changing the politics of international climate policy, traces existing UNFCCC processes and the Paris Agreement with a view to identifying inroads for a more direct feedback from non-state initiatives and derives recommendations on how and under which agenda items positive experiences can resonate within the UNFCCC negotiation process.

KW - Non-state and subnational actors

KW - Orchestration

KW - Paris Agreement

KW - Regime complex

KW - Transnational climate governance

KW - UNFCCC

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85045078125&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85045078125&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s10784-018-9398-9

DO - 10.1007/s10784-018-9398-9

M3 - Article

VL - 18

SP - 447

EP - 466

JO - International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics

JF - International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics

SN - 1567-9764

IS - 3

ER -