Abstract
One way to increase M&A success is to avoid completing deals anticipated to fail, but associated literature is broad and fragmented. It studies M±A failure from various disciplinary perspectives and examines M&A failure at separate stages of the M&A process. We take stock of this diverse literature and synthesize what is known about M&A failure through a systematic literature review. This allows us to identify three blind spots of the current M&A failure literature that require urgent research attention: (a) clarity on the definition and operationalization of M&A failure, (b) more integration across disciplines, and (c) a more processual perspective across M&A phases instead of a within-phase analysis. Altogether, we provide a comprehensive framework of M&A failure where we identify different determinants of M&A failure based on a classification of different M&A perspectives throughout different phases of the M&A process.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Title of host publication | A Research Agenda for Mergers and Acquisitions |
Editors | David R. King, Olimpia Meglio |
Publisher | Edward Elgar |
Chapter | 9 |
Pages | 177-197 |
Number of pages | 21 |
ISBN (Electronic) | 9781035319077 |
ISBN (Print) | 9781035319060 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 2024 |
Publication series
Name | Elgar Research Agendas |
---|---|
Publisher | Edward Elgar Publishing |
Bibliographical note
Publisher Copyright:© The Editors and Contributors Severally 2024. All rights reserved.
Keywords
- Interdisciplinary perspective
- M&A failure
- M&A performance
- M&A phases
- Merger and acquisition