Management strategies in response to an institutional crisis: The case of earthquakes in the Netherlands

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

When a policy sector is confronted with a relatively strong and steep decline in legitimacy, we speak of an institutional crisis. We know little about the causes or consequences of these crises. This article explores how institutional crises are managed. It focuses on the effects of management strategies observed in a case study of an institutional crisis in the Netherlands. While we found that policy elites displayed a tendency to maintain the status quo of a policy sector, we also found that the effectiveness of their response strategies was negated by the counter-response it evoked among freshly energized interest, advocacy and citizen groups. We conclude that the resolution of an institutional crisis is inherently contested. Based on our case study, we develop a theoretical model and formulate propositions that may help to improve our understanding of institutional crisis management.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)513-527
Number of pages15
JournalPublic Administration
Volume96
Issue number3
Early online date24 May 2018
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Sep 2018

Fingerprint

natural disaster
Netherlands
management
legitimacy
elite
citizen
cause
Group

Cite this

@article{f8c2c2ff013f4cc599ba0d2a6f1389d4,
title = "Management strategies in response to an institutional crisis: The case of earthquakes in the Netherlands",
abstract = "When a policy sector is confronted with a relatively strong and steep decline in legitimacy, we speak of an institutional crisis. We know little about the causes or consequences of these crises. This article explores how institutional crises are managed. It focuses on the effects of management strategies observed in a case study of an institutional crisis in the Netherlands. While we found that policy elites displayed a tendency to maintain the status quo of a policy sector, we also found that the effectiveness of their response strategies was negated by the counter-response it evoked among freshly energized interest, advocacy and citizen groups. We conclude that the resolution of an institutional crisis is inherently contested. Based on our case study, we develop a theoretical model and formulate propositions that may help to improve our understanding of institutional crisis management.",
author = "Arjen Schmidt and Kees Boersma and Peter Groenewegen",
year = "2018",
month = "9",
doi = "10.1111/padm.12516",
language = "English",
volume = "96",
pages = "513--527",
journal = "Public Administration",
issn = "0033-3298",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "3",

}

Management strategies in response to an institutional crisis : The case of earthquakes in the Netherlands. / Schmidt, Arjen; Boersma, Kees; Groenewegen, Peter.

In: Public Administration, Vol. 96, No. 3, 09.2018, p. 513-527.

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Management strategies in response to an institutional crisis

T2 - The case of earthquakes in the Netherlands

AU - Schmidt, Arjen

AU - Boersma, Kees

AU - Groenewegen, Peter

PY - 2018/9

Y1 - 2018/9

N2 - When a policy sector is confronted with a relatively strong and steep decline in legitimacy, we speak of an institutional crisis. We know little about the causes or consequences of these crises. This article explores how institutional crises are managed. It focuses on the effects of management strategies observed in a case study of an institutional crisis in the Netherlands. While we found that policy elites displayed a tendency to maintain the status quo of a policy sector, we also found that the effectiveness of their response strategies was negated by the counter-response it evoked among freshly energized interest, advocacy and citizen groups. We conclude that the resolution of an institutional crisis is inherently contested. Based on our case study, we develop a theoretical model and formulate propositions that may help to improve our understanding of institutional crisis management.

AB - When a policy sector is confronted with a relatively strong and steep decline in legitimacy, we speak of an institutional crisis. We know little about the causes or consequences of these crises. This article explores how institutional crises are managed. It focuses on the effects of management strategies observed in a case study of an institutional crisis in the Netherlands. While we found that policy elites displayed a tendency to maintain the status quo of a policy sector, we also found that the effectiveness of their response strategies was negated by the counter-response it evoked among freshly energized interest, advocacy and citizen groups. We conclude that the resolution of an institutional crisis is inherently contested. Based on our case study, we develop a theoretical model and formulate propositions that may help to improve our understanding of institutional crisis management.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85053615338&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85053615338&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/padm.12516

DO - 10.1111/padm.12516

M3 - Article

VL - 96

SP - 513

EP - 527

JO - Public Administration

JF - Public Administration

SN - 0033-3298

IS - 3

ER -