TY - JOUR
T1 - Managing tensions in sustainable business models
T2 - Exploring instrumental and integrative strategies
AU - van Bommel, Koen
PY - 2018/9/20
Y1 - 2018/9/20
N2 - This study empirically examines tensions around business model innovations for sustainability and the strategies that organizations employ to manage these tensions. A central conjecture of the study is that in order to successfully manage sustainable business models, firms need to confront sustainability's oftentimes paradoxical tensions. The research examined 30 firms that had sought to make business model innovations for sustainability; the results suggest that one group of organizations was shy of embracing these tensions and relied primarily on an instrumental or narrow ‘business case’ approach, viewing sustainability as an “either/or” scenario. However, another group of firms was aiming to work through these tensions by utilizing more paradoxical or integrative strategies, thus aiming for a “both/and” scenario. This group found it easier to manage their sustainable business models. The results highlight how applying the lens of paradox can help organizations to make sense of the complexity of sustainability; paradoxical thinking can help to reduce tensions, ambiguity and uncertainty and improve the management of complex sustainability challenges. In addition to their practical relevance, the findings have implications for both the literature on sustainable business models and the emerging paradox perspective on corporate sustainability.
AB - This study empirically examines tensions around business model innovations for sustainability and the strategies that organizations employ to manage these tensions. A central conjecture of the study is that in order to successfully manage sustainable business models, firms need to confront sustainability's oftentimes paradoxical tensions. The research examined 30 firms that had sought to make business model innovations for sustainability; the results suggest that one group of organizations was shy of embracing these tensions and relied primarily on an instrumental or narrow ‘business case’ approach, viewing sustainability as an “either/or” scenario. However, another group of firms was aiming to work through these tensions by utilizing more paradoxical or integrative strategies, thus aiming for a “both/and” scenario. This group found it easier to manage their sustainable business models. The results highlight how applying the lens of paradox can help organizations to make sense of the complexity of sustainability; paradoxical thinking can help to reduce tensions, ambiguity and uncertainty and improve the management of complex sustainability challenges. In addition to their practical relevance, the findings have implications for both the literature on sustainable business models and the emerging paradox perspective on corporate sustainability.
KW - Business case
KW - Corporate sustainability
KW - Instrumental approach
KW - Integrative approach
KW - Paradox
KW - Sustainable business models
KW - Tensions
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85049304335&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85049304335&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.06.063
DO - 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.06.063
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85049304335
SN - 0959-6526
VL - 196
SP - 829
EP - 841
JO - Journal of Cleaner Production
JF - Journal of Cleaner Production
ER -