Managing tensions in sustainable business models: Exploring instrumental and integrative strategies

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

This study empirically examines tensions around business model innovations for sustainability and the strategies that organizations employ to manage these tensions. A central conjecture of the study is that in order to successfully manage sustainable business models, firms need to confront sustainability's oftentimes paradoxical tensions. The research examined 30 firms that had sought to make business model innovations for sustainability; the results suggest that one group of organizations was shy of embracing these tensions and relied primarily on an instrumental or narrow ‘business case’ approach, viewing sustainability as an “either/or” scenario. However, another group of firms was aiming to work through these tensions by utilizing more paradoxical or integrative strategies, thus aiming for a “both/and” scenario. This group found it easier to manage their sustainable business models. The results highlight how applying the lens of paradox can help organizations to make sense of the complexity of sustainability; paradoxical thinking can help to reduce tensions, ambiguity and uncertainty and improve the management of complex sustainability challenges. In addition to their practical relevance, the findings have implications for both the literature on sustainable business models and the emerging paradox perspective on corporate sustainability.

LanguageEnglish
Pages829-841
Number of pages13
JournalJournal of Cleaner Production
Volume196
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 20 Sep 2018

Fingerprint

Sustainable development
sustainability
Industry
innovation
Innovation
Business model
Sustainability
Sustainable business
Lenses
firm
Scenarios
Business model innovation
Paradox

Keywords

  • Business case
  • Corporate sustainability
  • Instrumental approach
  • Integrative approach
  • Paradox
  • Sustainable business models
  • Tensions

Cite this

@article{1dd783c5933646499ff1b2258497b9f4,
title = "Managing tensions in sustainable business models: Exploring instrumental and integrative strategies",
abstract = "This study empirically examines tensions around business model innovations for sustainability and the strategies that organizations employ to manage these tensions. A central conjecture of the study is that in order to successfully manage sustainable business models, firms need to confront sustainability's oftentimes paradoxical tensions. The research examined 30 firms that had sought to make business model innovations for sustainability; the results suggest that one group of organizations was shy of embracing these tensions and relied primarily on an instrumental or narrow ‘business case’ approach, viewing sustainability as an “either/or” scenario. However, another group of firms was aiming to work through these tensions by utilizing more paradoxical or integrative strategies, thus aiming for a “both/and” scenario. This group found it easier to manage their sustainable business models. The results highlight how applying the lens of paradox can help organizations to make sense of the complexity of sustainability; paradoxical thinking can help to reduce tensions, ambiguity and uncertainty and improve the management of complex sustainability challenges. In addition to their practical relevance, the findings have implications for both the literature on sustainable business models and the emerging paradox perspective on corporate sustainability.",
keywords = "Business case, Corporate sustainability, Instrumental approach, Integrative approach, Paradox, Sustainable business models, Tensions",
author = "{van Bommel}, Koen",
year = "2018",
month = "9",
day = "20",
doi = "10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.06.063",
language = "English",
volume = "196",
pages = "829--841",
journal = "Journal of Cleaner Production",
issn = "0959-6526",
publisher = "Elsevier Limited",

}

Managing tensions in sustainable business models : Exploring instrumental and integrative strategies. / van Bommel, Koen.

In: Journal of Cleaner Production, Vol. 196, 20.09.2018, p. 829-841.

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Managing tensions in sustainable business models

T2 - Journal of Cleaner Production

AU - van Bommel, Koen

PY - 2018/9/20

Y1 - 2018/9/20

N2 - This study empirically examines tensions around business model innovations for sustainability and the strategies that organizations employ to manage these tensions. A central conjecture of the study is that in order to successfully manage sustainable business models, firms need to confront sustainability's oftentimes paradoxical tensions. The research examined 30 firms that had sought to make business model innovations for sustainability; the results suggest that one group of organizations was shy of embracing these tensions and relied primarily on an instrumental or narrow ‘business case’ approach, viewing sustainability as an “either/or” scenario. However, another group of firms was aiming to work through these tensions by utilizing more paradoxical or integrative strategies, thus aiming for a “both/and” scenario. This group found it easier to manage their sustainable business models. The results highlight how applying the lens of paradox can help organizations to make sense of the complexity of sustainability; paradoxical thinking can help to reduce tensions, ambiguity and uncertainty and improve the management of complex sustainability challenges. In addition to their practical relevance, the findings have implications for both the literature on sustainable business models and the emerging paradox perspective on corporate sustainability.

AB - This study empirically examines tensions around business model innovations for sustainability and the strategies that organizations employ to manage these tensions. A central conjecture of the study is that in order to successfully manage sustainable business models, firms need to confront sustainability's oftentimes paradoxical tensions. The research examined 30 firms that had sought to make business model innovations for sustainability; the results suggest that one group of organizations was shy of embracing these tensions and relied primarily on an instrumental or narrow ‘business case’ approach, viewing sustainability as an “either/or” scenario. However, another group of firms was aiming to work through these tensions by utilizing more paradoxical or integrative strategies, thus aiming for a “both/and” scenario. This group found it easier to manage their sustainable business models. The results highlight how applying the lens of paradox can help organizations to make sense of the complexity of sustainability; paradoxical thinking can help to reduce tensions, ambiguity and uncertainty and improve the management of complex sustainability challenges. In addition to their practical relevance, the findings have implications for both the literature on sustainable business models and the emerging paradox perspective on corporate sustainability.

KW - Business case

KW - Corporate sustainability

KW - Instrumental approach

KW - Integrative approach

KW - Paradox

KW - Sustainable business models

KW - Tensions

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85049304335&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85049304335&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.06.063

DO - 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.06.063

M3 - Article

VL - 196

SP - 829

EP - 841

JO - Journal of Cleaner Production

JF - Journal of Cleaner Production

SN - 0959-6526

ER -