Market power in bilateral oligopoly markets with non-expandable infrastructures

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

We develop a novel model of price-fee competition in bilateral oligopoly markets with non-expandable infrastructures and costly transportation. The model captures a variety of real market situations and it is the continuous quantity version of the assignment game with indivisible goods on a fixed network. We define and characterize stable market outcomes. Buyers exclusively trade with the supplier with whom they achieve maximal bilateral joint welfare at prices equal to marginal costs. Maximal fees and the suppliers’ market power are restricted by the buyers’ credible threats to switch suppliers. Maximal fees also arise from a negotiation model that extends price competition to price-fee competition. Competition in both prices and fees necessarily emerges. It improves welfare compared to price competition, but buyers will not be better off. The minimal infrastructure achieving maximal aggregate welfare differs from the minimal network that protects buyers most.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)525-546
JournalInternational Journal of Game Theory
Volume49
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2020

Keywords

  • Assignment games
  • Infrastructure
  • Market power
  • Negotiations
  • Non-linear pricing

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Market power in bilateral oligopoly markets with non-expandable infrastructures'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this