Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Market power in bilateral oligopoly markets with non-expandable infrastructures

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

We develop a novel model of price-fee competition in bilateral oligopoly markets with non-expandable infrastructures and costly transportation. The model captures a variety of real market situations and it is the continuous quantity version of the assignment game with indivisible goods on a fixed network. We define and characterize stable market outcomes. Buyers exclusively trade with the supplier with whom they achieve maximal bilateral joint welfare at prices equal to marginal costs. Maximal fees and the suppliers’ market power are restricted by the buyers’ credible threats to switch suppliers. Maximal fees also arise from a negotiation model that extends price competition to price-fee competition. Competition in both prices and fees necessarily emerges. It improves welfare compared to price competition, but buyers will not be better off. The minimal infrastructure achieving maximal aggregate welfare differs from the minimal network that protects buyers most.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)525-546
Number of pages22
JournalInternational Journal of Game Theory
Volume49
Issue number2
Early online date27 Sept 2019
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jun 2020

Funding

FundersFunder number
Japan Society for the Promotion of Science18KK0046
Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam

    UN SDGs

    This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

    1. SDG 17 - Partnerships for the Goals
      SDG 17 Partnerships for the Goals

    Keywords

    • Assignment games
    • Infrastructure
    • Market power
    • Negotiations
    • Non-linear pricing

    Cite this