“Masculine” Describes Gender Expressions, Not Neurobiologies: Response to Dutton and Madison (2020)

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

This letter is a response to “Gender Dysphoria and Transgender Identity Is Associated with Physiological and Psychological Masculinization: a Theoretical Integration of Findings, Supported by Systematic Reviews” by Dutton and Madison (2020), which relies on theorisations for which substantial counter-evidence exists, fails to engage with these or other criticisms of the theories upon which it seeks to build, and reaches conclusions that contradict existing evidence. Furthermore, the original theorisations contained in Dutton and Madison (2020), and the conclusions drawn from those theorisations, risk causing serious harm to already-marginalised groups.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1-3
Number of pages3
JournalSexuality Research and Social Policy
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 28 Sep 2020

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of '“Masculine” Describes Gender Expressions, Not Neurobiologies: Response to Dutton and Madison (2020)'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this