Meaningful culturalization in an academic hospital: Belonging and difference in the interference zone between system and life world

H. Leyerzapf, Tineke A Abma, Petra Verdonk, H. Ghorashi

Research output: Chapter in Book / Report / Conference proceedingChapterAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Purpose – In this chapter, we explore how normalization of exclusionary practices and of privilege for seemingly same professionals and disadvantage for seemingly different professionals in academic healthcare organizations can be challenged via meaningful culturalization in the interference zone between system and life world, subsequently developing space for belonging and difference. Methodology – This nested case study focusses on professionals’ narratives from one specific setting (team) within the broader research and research field of the Dutch academic hospital (Abma & Stake, 2014). We followed a responsive design, conducting interviews with cultural minority and majority professionals and recording participant observations. Findings – In the Netherlands, the instrumental, system-inspired business model of diversity is reflected in two discourses in academic hospitals: first, an ideology of equality as sameness, and second, professionalism as neutral, rational, impersonal and decontextual. Due to these discourses, cultural minority professionals can be identified as ‘different’ and evaluated as less professional than cultural majority, or seemingly ‘same’, professionals. Furthermore, life world values of trust and connectedness, and professionals’ emotions and social contexts are devalued, and professionals’ desire to belong comes under pressure. Value – Diversity management from a system-based logic can never be successful. Instead, system norms of productivity and efficiency need to be reconnected to life world values of connectivity, personal recognition, embodied knowledge and taking time to reflect. Working towards alternative safe spaces that generate transformative meaningful culturalization and may enable structural inclusion of minority professionals further entails critical reflexivity on power dynamics and sameness–difference hierarchy in the academic hospital.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationContested Belonging
Subtitle of host publicationSpaces, Practices, Biographies
EditorsKathy Davis, Halleh Ghorashi, Peer Smets
Place of PublicationBingley
PublisherEmerald Publishing
Chapter9
Pages209-232
Number of pages24
ISBN (Electronic)9781787432062
ISBN (Print)9781787432079
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 29 May 2018

Fingerprint

interference
minority
Values
discourse
reflexivity
normalization
participant observation
field research
privilege
recording
equality
Netherlands
emotion
ideology
productivity
inclusion
narrative
efficiency
methodology
interview

Cite this

Leyerzapf, H., Abma, T. A., Verdonk, P., & Ghorashi, H. (2018). Meaningful culturalization in an academic hospital: Belonging and difference in the interference zone between system and life world. In K. Davis, H. Ghorashi, & P. Smets (Eds.), Contested Belonging: Spaces, Practices, Biographies (pp. 209-232). Bingley: Emerald Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1108/978-1-78743-206-220181010, https://doi.org/10.1108/9781787432062
Leyerzapf, H. ; Abma, Tineke A ; Verdonk, Petra ; Ghorashi, H. / Meaningful culturalization in an academic hospital : Belonging and difference in the interference zone between system and life world. Contested Belonging: Spaces, Practices, Biographies. editor / Kathy Davis ; Halleh Ghorashi ; Peer Smets. Bingley : Emerald Publishing, 2018. pp. 209-232
@inbook{005fa49f90914688aeb213bb55bfc1bb,
title = "Meaningful culturalization in an academic hospital: Belonging and difference in the interference zone between system and life world",
abstract = "Purpose – In this chapter, we explore how normalization of exclusionary practices and of privilege for seemingly same professionals and disadvantage for seemingly different professionals in academic healthcare organizations can be challenged via meaningful culturalization in the interference zone between system and life world, subsequently developing space for belonging and difference. Methodology – This nested case study focusses on professionals’ narratives from one specific setting (team) within the broader research and research field of the Dutch academic hospital (Abma & Stake, 2014). We followed a responsive design, conducting interviews with cultural minority and majority professionals and recording participant observations. Findings – In the Netherlands, the instrumental, system-inspired business model of diversity is reflected in two discourses in academic hospitals: first, an ideology of equality as sameness, and second, professionalism as neutral, rational, impersonal and decontextual. Due to these discourses, cultural minority professionals can be identified as ‘different’ and evaluated as less professional than cultural majority, or seemingly ‘same’, professionals. Furthermore, life world values of trust and connectedness, and professionals’ emotions and social contexts are devalued, and professionals’ desire to belong comes under pressure. Value – Diversity management from a system-based logic can never be successful. Instead, system norms of productivity and efficiency need to be reconnected to life world values of connectivity, personal recognition, embodied knowledge and taking time to reflect. Working towards alternative safe spaces that generate transformative meaningful culturalization and may enable structural inclusion of minority professionals further entails critical reflexivity on power dynamics and sameness–difference hierarchy in the academic hospital.",
author = "H. Leyerzapf and Abma, {Tineke A} and Petra Verdonk and H. Ghorashi",
year = "2018",
month = "5",
day = "29",
doi = "10.1108/978-1-78743-206-220181010",
language = "English",
isbn = "9781787432079",
pages = "209--232",
editor = "Kathy Davis and Halleh Ghorashi and Peer Smets",
booktitle = "Contested Belonging",
publisher = "Emerald Publishing",

}

Leyerzapf, H, Abma, TA, Verdonk, P & Ghorashi, H 2018, Meaningful culturalization in an academic hospital: Belonging and difference in the interference zone between system and life world. in K Davis, H Ghorashi & P Smets (eds), Contested Belonging: Spaces, Practices, Biographies. Emerald Publishing, Bingley, pp. 209-232. https://doi.org/10.1108/978-1-78743-206-220181010, https://doi.org/10.1108/9781787432062

Meaningful culturalization in an academic hospital : Belonging and difference in the interference zone between system and life world. / Leyerzapf, H.; Abma, Tineke A; Verdonk, Petra; Ghorashi, H.

Contested Belonging: Spaces, Practices, Biographies. ed. / Kathy Davis; Halleh Ghorashi; Peer Smets. Bingley : Emerald Publishing, 2018. p. 209-232.

Research output: Chapter in Book / Report / Conference proceedingChapterAcademicpeer-review

TY - CHAP

T1 - Meaningful culturalization in an academic hospital

T2 - Belonging and difference in the interference zone between system and life world

AU - Leyerzapf, H.

AU - Abma, Tineke A

AU - Verdonk, Petra

AU - Ghorashi, H.

PY - 2018/5/29

Y1 - 2018/5/29

N2 - Purpose – In this chapter, we explore how normalization of exclusionary practices and of privilege for seemingly same professionals and disadvantage for seemingly different professionals in academic healthcare organizations can be challenged via meaningful culturalization in the interference zone between system and life world, subsequently developing space for belonging and difference. Methodology – This nested case study focusses on professionals’ narratives from one specific setting (team) within the broader research and research field of the Dutch academic hospital (Abma & Stake, 2014). We followed a responsive design, conducting interviews with cultural minority and majority professionals and recording participant observations. Findings – In the Netherlands, the instrumental, system-inspired business model of diversity is reflected in two discourses in academic hospitals: first, an ideology of equality as sameness, and second, professionalism as neutral, rational, impersonal and decontextual. Due to these discourses, cultural minority professionals can be identified as ‘different’ and evaluated as less professional than cultural majority, or seemingly ‘same’, professionals. Furthermore, life world values of trust and connectedness, and professionals’ emotions and social contexts are devalued, and professionals’ desire to belong comes under pressure. Value – Diversity management from a system-based logic can never be successful. Instead, system norms of productivity and efficiency need to be reconnected to life world values of connectivity, personal recognition, embodied knowledge and taking time to reflect. Working towards alternative safe spaces that generate transformative meaningful culturalization and may enable structural inclusion of minority professionals further entails critical reflexivity on power dynamics and sameness–difference hierarchy in the academic hospital.

AB - Purpose – In this chapter, we explore how normalization of exclusionary practices and of privilege for seemingly same professionals and disadvantage for seemingly different professionals in academic healthcare organizations can be challenged via meaningful culturalization in the interference zone between system and life world, subsequently developing space for belonging and difference. Methodology – This nested case study focusses on professionals’ narratives from one specific setting (team) within the broader research and research field of the Dutch academic hospital (Abma & Stake, 2014). We followed a responsive design, conducting interviews with cultural minority and majority professionals and recording participant observations. Findings – In the Netherlands, the instrumental, system-inspired business model of diversity is reflected in two discourses in academic hospitals: first, an ideology of equality as sameness, and second, professionalism as neutral, rational, impersonal and decontextual. Due to these discourses, cultural minority professionals can be identified as ‘different’ and evaluated as less professional than cultural majority, or seemingly ‘same’, professionals. Furthermore, life world values of trust and connectedness, and professionals’ emotions and social contexts are devalued, and professionals’ desire to belong comes under pressure. Value – Diversity management from a system-based logic can never be successful. Instead, system norms of productivity and efficiency need to be reconnected to life world values of connectivity, personal recognition, embodied knowledge and taking time to reflect. Working towards alternative safe spaces that generate transformative meaningful culturalization and may enable structural inclusion of minority professionals further entails critical reflexivity on power dynamics and sameness–difference hierarchy in the academic hospital.

UR - https://books.emeraldinsight.com/page/detail/contested-belonging-kathy-davis/?k=9781787432079

U2 - 10.1108/978-1-78743-206-220181010

DO - 10.1108/978-1-78743-206-220181010

M3 - Chapter

SN - 9781787432079

SP - 209

EP - 232

BT - Contested Belonging

A2 - Davis, Kathy

A2 - Ghorashi, Halleh

A2 - Smets, Peer

PB - Emerald Publishing

CY - Bingley

ER -

Leyerzapf H, Abma TA, Verdonk P, Ghorashi H. Meaningful culturalization in an academic hospital: Belonging and difference in the interference zone between system and life world. In Davis K, Ghorashi H, Smets P, editors, Contested Belonging: Spaces, Practices, Biographies. Bingley: Emerald Publishing. 2018. p. 209-232 https://doi.org/10.1108/978-1-78743-206-220181010, https://doi.org/10.1108/9781787432062