Measurable Like Temperature or Mereological Like Flocking? On the Nature of Personality Traits

A.O.J. Cramer, S. van der Sluis, A. Noordhof, M. Wichers, N. Geschwind, S.H. Aggen, K. S. Kendler, D. Borsboom

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Some commentators wholeheartedly disagreed with the central tenet of the network perspective on personality, namely that traits are the result of mutual interactions between thoughts, feelings and behaviours. In this rejoinder, we primarily focus on these commentaries by (i) clarifying the main differences between the latent versus the network view on traits; (ii) discussing some of the arguments in favour of the latent trait views that were put forward by these commentators; and by (iii) comparing the capacity of both views to explain thoughts, feelings and behaviours. Some commentators were by and large positive about the network perspective, and we discuss their excellent suggestions for defining components and linking these to genes and other biological mechanisms. We conclude that no doors should be closed in the study of personality and that, as such, alternative theories such as the network perspective should be welcomed, formalised and tested. © 2012 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd..
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)451-459
JournalEuropean Journal of Personality
Volume26
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2012

Fingerprint

Personality
Emotions
Temperature
Genes

Cite this

Cramer, A. O. J., van der Sluis, S., Noordhof, A., Wichers, M., Geschwind, N., Aggen, S. H., ... Borsboom, D. (2012). Measurable Like Temperature or Mereological Like Flocking? On the Nature of Personality Traits. European Journal of Personality, 26(4), 451-459. https://doi.org/10.1002/per.1879
Cramer, A.O.J. ; van der Sluis, S. ; Noordhof, A. ; Wichers, M. ; Geschwind, N. ; Aggen, S.H. ; Kendler, K. S. ; Borsboom, D. / Measurable Like Temperature or Mereological Like Flocking? On the Nature of Personality Traits. In: European Journal of Personality. 2012 ; Vol. 26, No. 4. pp. 451-459.
@article{6603fc22d0194b8bb7d1008fc579e06d,
title = "Measurable Like Temperature or Mereological Like Flocking? On the Nature of Personality Traits",
abstract = "Some commentators wholeheartedly disagreed with the central tenet of the network perspective on personality, namely that traits are the result of mutual interactions between thoughts, feelings and behaviours. In this rejoinder, we primarily focus on these commentaries by (i) clarifying the main differences between the latent versus the network view on traits; (ii) discussing some of the arguments in favour of the latent trait views that were put forward by these commentators; and by (iii) comparing the capacity of both views to explain thoughts, feelings and behaviours. Some commentators were by and large positive about the network perspective, and we discuss their excellent suggestions for defining components and linking these to genes and other biological mechanisms. We conclude that no doors should be closed in the study of personality and that, as such, alternative theories such as the network perspective should be welcomed, formalised and tested. {\circledC} 2012 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd..",
author = "A.O.J. Cramer and {van der Sluis}, S. and A. Noordhof and M. Wichers and N. Geschwind and S.H. Aggen and Kendler, {K. S.} and D. Borsboom",
year = "2012",
doi = "10.1002/per.1879",
language = "English",
volume = "26",
pages = "451--459",
journal = "European Journal of Personality",
issn = "0890-2070",
publisher = "John Wiley and Sons Ltd",
number = "4",

}

Cramer, AOJ, van der Sluis, S, Noordhof, A, Wichers, M, Geschwind, N, Aggen, SH, Kendler, KS & Borsboom, D 2012, 'Measurable Like Temperature or Mereological Like Flocking? On the Nature of Personality Traits' European Journal of Personality, vol. 26, no. 4, pp. 451-459. https://doi.org/10.1002/per.1879

Measurable Like Temperature or Mereological Like Flocking? On the Nature of Personality Traits. / Cramer, A.O.J.; van der Sluis, S.; Noordhof, A.; Wichers, M.; Geschwind, N.; Aggen, S.H.; Kendler, K. S.; Borsboom, D.

In: European Journal of Personality, Vol. 26, No. 4, 2012, p. 451-459.

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Measurable Like Temperature or Mereological Like Flocking? On the Nature of Personality Traits

AU - Cramer, A.O.J.

AU - van der Sluis, S.

AU - Noordhof, A.

AU - Wichers, M.

AU - Geschwind, N.

AU - Aggen, S.H.

AU - Kendler, K. S.

AU - Borsboom, D.

PY - 2012

Y1 - 2012

N2 - Some commentators wholeheartedly disagreed with the central tenet of the network perspective on personality, namely that traits are the result of mutual interactions between thoughts, feelings and behaviours. In this rejoinder, we primarily focus on these commentaries by (i) clarifying the main differences between the latent versus the network view on traits; (ii) discussing some of the arguments in favour of the latent trait views that were put forward by these commentators; and by (iii) comparing the capacity of both views to explain thoughts, feelings and behaviours. Some commentators were by and large positive about the network perspective, and we discuss their excellent suggestions for defining components and linking these to genes and other biological mechanisms. We conclude that no doors should be closed in the study of personality and that, as such, alternative theories such as the network perspective should be welcomed, formalised and tested. © 2012 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd..

AB - Some commentators wholeheartedly disagreed with the central tenet of the network perspective on personality, namely that traits are the result of mutual interactions between thoughts, feelings and behaviours. In this rejoinder, we primarily focus on these commentaries by (i) clarifying the main differences between the latent versus the network view on traits; (ii) discussing some of the arguments in favour of the latent trait views that were put forward by these commentators; and by (iii) comparing the capacity of both views to explain thoughts, feelings and behaviours. Some commentators were by and large positive about the network perspective, and we discuss their excellent suggestions for defining components and linking these to genes and other biological mechanisms. We conclude that no doors should be closed in the study of personality and that, as such, alternative theories such as the network perspective should be welcomed, formalised and tested. © 2012 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd..

U2 - 10.1002/per.1879

DO - 10.1002/per.1879

M3 - Article

VL - 26

SP - 451

EP - 459

JO - European Journal of Personality

JF - European Journal of Personality

SN - 0890-2070

IS - 4

ER -