Measuring inequalities in urban systems: An approach for evaluating the distribution of amenities and burdens

T.M. Logan, M.J. Anderson, T.G. Williams, L. Conrow

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

© 2021 Elsevier LtdCurrent approaches for measuring inequality are insufficient or unsuitable for promoting and designing equitable built environments and urban systems. In this paper, we demonstrate how a recently developed inequality measure—the Kolm-Pollak equally-distributed equivalent (EDE)—could be used to support decision making to foster equity in the built environment. The EDE provides a measure of a distribution that is similar to the average (mean) but includes a penalty based on the inequality of that distribution. The primary advantage of the Kolm-Pollak EDE is that it can be used to evaluate the inequality of both desirable quantities (e.g., amenities) and undesirable quantities (e.g., burdens). This is essential in urban systems as inequities can manifest through, among other things, disparate access to opportunities like public amenities and unequal exposure to burdens, such as pollution and natural hazards. Additionally, the Kolm-Pollak EDE can be calculated for different sociodemographic subgroups, enabling needs-based assessments to promote environmental justice. Thus, the Kolm-Pollak EDE presents numerous opportunities for practitioners, policymakers, and researchers concerned with advancing equity. We demonstrate the approach with a case study of grocery store access in ten cities across the USA and provide a Python package (inequalipy) and R code to enable others to use these inequality metrics.
Original languageEnglish
Article number101590
JournalComputers, Environment and Urban Systems
Volume86
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Mar 2021
Externally publishedYes

Funding

MJA was funded by the Department of Civil and Natural Resources Engineering at the University of Canterbury, this support is much appreciated. TGW acknowledges the support of a University of Michigan Rackham PreDoctoral Fellowship.

FundersFunder number
Department of Civil and Natural Resources Engineering at the University of Canterbury
University of Michigan

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Measuring inequalities in urban systems: An approach for evaluating the distribution of amenities and burdens'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this