Measuring researcher independence using bibliometric data: A proposal for a new performance indicator

Peter van den Besselaar, Ulf Sandström

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Bibliometric indicators are increasingly used to evaluate individual scientists–as is exemplified by the popularity of the many other publication and citation-based indicators used in evaluation. These indicators, however, cover at best some of the quality dimensions relevant for assessing a researcher: productivity and impact. At the same time, research quality has more dimensions than productivity and impact alone. As current bibliometric indicators are not covering various important quality dimensions, we here contribute to developing better indicators for those quality dimensions not yet addressed. One of the quality dimensions lacking valid indicators is an individual researcher’s independence. We propose indicators to measure different aspects of independence: two assessing whether a researcher has developed an own collaboration network and two others assessing the level of thematic independence. Taken together they form an independence indicator. We illustrate how these indicators distinguish between researchers that are equally productive and have a considerable impact. The independence indicator is a step forward in evaluating individual scholarly quality.

Original languageEnglish
Article numbere0202712
Pages (from-to)1-20
Number of pages20
JournalPLoS ONE
Volume14
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 27 Mar 2019

Fingerprint

Bibliometrics
researchers
Productivity
Research Personnel
bibliometric analysis
Research

Cite this

@article{89502f3348ec47c685a591b950d1d1b0,
title = "Measuring researcher independence using bibliometric data: A proposal for a new performance indicator",
abstract = "Bibliometric indicators are increasingly used to evaluate individual scientists–as is exemplified by the popularity of the many other publication and citation-based indicators used in evaluation. These indicators, however, cover at best some of the quality dimensions relevant for assessing a researcher: productivity and impact. At the same time, research quality has more dimensions than productivity and impact alone. As current bibliometric indicators are not covering various important quality dimensions, we here contribute to developing better indicators for those quality dimensions not yet addressed. One of the quality dimensions lacking valid indicators is an individual researcher’s independence. We propose indicators to measure different aspects of independence: two assessing whether a researcher has developed an own collaboration network and two others assessing the level of thematic independence. Taken together they form an independence indicator. We illustrate how these indicators distinguish between researchers that are equally productive and have a considerable impact. The independence indicator is a step forward in evaluating individual scholarly quality.",
author = "{van den Besselaar}, Peter and Ulf Sandstr{\"o}m",
year = "2019",
month = "3",
day = "27",
doi = "10.1371/journal.pone.0202712",
language = "English",
volume = "14",
pages = "1--20",
journal = "PLoS ONE",
issn = "1932-6203",
publisher = "Public Library of Science",
number = "3",

}

Measuring researcher independence using bibliometric data : A proposal for a new performance indicator. / van den Besselaar, Peter; Sandström, Ulf.

In: PLoS ONE, Vol. 14, No. 3, e0202712, 27.03.2019, p. 1-20.

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Measuring researcher independence using bibliometric data

T2 - A proposal for a new performance indicator

AU - van den Besselaar, Peter

AU - Sandström, Ulf

PY - 2019/3/27

Y1 - 2019/3/27

N2 - Bibliometric indicators are increasingly used to evaluate individual scientists–as is exemplified by the popularity of the many other publication and citation-based indicators used in evaluation. These indicators, however, cover at best some of the quality dimensions relevant for assessing a researcher: productivity and impact. At the same time, research quality has more dimensions than productivity and impact alone. As current bibliometric indicators are not covering various important quality dimensions, we here contribute to developing better indicators for those quality dimensions not yet addressed. One of the quality dimensions lacking valid indicators is an individual researcher’s independence. We propose indicators to measure different aspects of independence: two assessing whether a researcher has developed an own collaboration network and two others assessing the level of thematic independence. Taken together they form an independence indicator. We illustrate how these indicators distinguish between researchers that are equally productive and have a considerable impact. The independence indicator is a step forward in evaluating individual scholarly quality.

AB - Bibliometric indicators are increasingly used to evaluate individual scientists–as is exemplified by the popularity of the many other publication and citation-based indicators used in evaluation. These indicators, however, cover at best some of the quality dimensions relevant for assessing a researcher: productivity and impact. At the same time, research quality has more dimensions than productivity and impact alone. As current bibliometric indicators are not covering various important quality dimensions, we here contribute to developing better indicators for those quality dimensions not yet addressed. One of the quality dimensions lacking valid indicators is an individual researcher’s independence. We propose indicators to measure different aspects of independence: two assessing whether a researcher has developed an own collaboration network and two others assessing the level of thematic independence. Taken together they form an independence indicator. We illustrate how these indicators distinguish between researchers that are equally productive and have a considerable impact. The independence indicator is a step forward in evaluating individual scholarly quality.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85063577996&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85063577996&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1371/journal.pone.0202712

DO - 10.1371/journal.pone.0202712

M3 - Article

VL - 14

SP - 1

EP - 20

JO - PLoS ONE

JF - PLoS ONE

SN - 1932-6203

IS - 3

M1 - e0202712

ER -