Mediating role of C-reactive protein in associations between pre-pregnancy BMI and adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes: the ABCD-study cohort

Anke B. Witteveen, Jens Henrichs, Mirthe Bellers, Esmée van Oenen, Corine J. Verhoeven, Tanja G.M. Vrijkotte

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Objectives: Increased body mass index (BMI) is associated with several adverse pregnancy outcomes, though the underlying mechanism of this association has not been fully elucidated. A mediating role of low-grade systemic inflammation in these associations is suspected but has been understudied. Our objective was to examine the effect of pre-pregnancy BMI (pBMI) on maternal and neonatal pregnancy outcomes and to explore potential mediation of these effects by C-reactive protein (CRP), a first trimester peripheral marker of inflammation. Methods: Data from the prospective community-based ABCD-study cohort (n = 3547) was used to assess associations between self-reported continuous and categorized pBMI and outcome measures gestational hypertension (GH) and preeclampsia (PE), preterm birth (PTB) and small for gestational age (SGA) based on national perinatal registration linkage data. High-sensitivity CRP concentrations determined in serum were used to explore potential mediation of these associations by inflammation. Results: Multivariable logistic regression analyses, adjusted for confounders, showed that pBMI was significantly related to gestational hypertensive disorders (odds ratio (OR) per standard deviation (SD) 1.66, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.51–1.83) and PTB (OR 1.20, 95% CI 1.05–1.37). Dose–response relationships between categorical pBMI and gestational hypertensive disorders (overweight OR 2.37, 95% CI 1.85–3.03 and obese OR 4.45, 95% CI 2.93–6.72) and PTB (obese OR 2.12, 95% CI 1.16–3.87) were found as well. SGA was only significantly more prevalent in the underweight BMI category (OR 2.06, 95% CI 1.33–3.19). Mediation analyses revealed small but significant indirect effects of pBMI on overall PTB (0.037, bootstrapped 95% CI 0.005–0.065) and spontaneous PTB (0.038, bootstrapped 95% CI 0.002–0.069) through higher CRP. CRP was not a significant mediator of associations between BMI and gestational hypertensive disorders although larger mediation was found for GH than for PE. Conclusion: Our findings provide additional evidence that high(er) pBMI increases the risk of adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes and that systemic inflammation mediates some of these risks. Further research in large cohorts including (morbidly) obese women is warranted to identify pathways that may be incorporated in future interventions to reduce the risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes due to maternal obesity.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)2867-2875
JournalJournal of Maternal-Fetal and Neonatal Medicine
Volume35
Issue number15
DOIs
Publication statusAccepted/In press - 2020
Externally publishedYes

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2020 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.

Copyright:
Copyright 2020 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.

Funding

was provided by the Academic Medical Centre, Amsterdam, the Public Health Services, Amsterdam, and by the Netherlands Organisation for Health Research and Development (ZonMw research grant [2100.0076 TOP 40-00812-98-11010]). We thank all participating hospitals, obstetric clinics, and general practitioners for their assistance in implementing the ABCD-study. We also gratefully acknowledge all the women who participated in this study for their cooperation. We thank Prof. dr. J.W.R. Twisk for statistical advice.

FundersFunder number
ZonMw2100.0076 TOP 40-00812-98-11010

    Keywords

    • Body mass index
    • gestational hypertension
    • inflammation
    • preeclampsia
    • preterm birth
    • small for gestational age

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Mediating role of C-reactive protein in associations between pre-pregnancy BMI and adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes: the ABCD-study cohort'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this