Meeting the Eunuch and the Foreigner: Acts 8:26-40 in Its Various Contexts and Its Reception History

    Research output: Chapter in Book / Report / Conference proceedingChapterAcademic

    3 Downloads (Pure)

    Abstract

    Some biblical passages seem to have become obsolete over the course of history. The baptism of the Ethiopian eunuch by Philip in Acts 8:26-40 seems to be such a passage. It goes without saying that foreigners or people of color can become Christians and that the gospel finds its way to countries other than Israel or Europe. Moreover, eunuchs are no longer within our field of vision. It is a figure from a distant past or from far away cultures. Especially for Christian theologians today, this also applies to other pericopes about eunuchs, such as Isaiah 56:1-8 or Matthew 19:11-12. The former text is about eunuchs who wanted to contribute to the post-exilic Jewish community. The latter text, in which Jesus seems to recommend eunuchship, is completely appalling nowadays, if taken seriously. Yet, these texts are making a comeback in theological literature in recent times.
    Original languageEnglish
    Title of host publicationMeaningful Meetings with Foreigners in the World of the Bible
    Subtitle of host publicationEssays in Honour of Klaas Spronk on the Occasion of His Retirement
    EditorsMarjo Korpel, Paul Sanders
    Place of PublicationLeuven
    PublisherPeeters
    Pages211-231
    Number of pages21
    ISBN (Electronic)9789042952959
    ISBN (Print)9789042952942
    Publication statusPublished - 2024

    Publication series

    NameContributions to Biblical Exegesis and Theology
    PublisherPeeters
    Volume119

    Keywords

    • eunuch
    • foreigner
    • Acts 8
    • Philip
    • gender and bible
    • gender and race
    • Gender and Religion

    VU Research Profile

    • Connected World

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Meeting the Eunuch and the Foreigner: Acts 8:26-40 in Its Various Contexts and Its Reception History'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this